M/S Bajrang Wire Products INDIA Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIA
Held
The Court held that the petitioner's request to withdraw the petition should be granted. The learned counsel for the petitioner made a submission seeking permission to withdraw the petition. Following this submission, the Court passed an order dismissing the petition as withdrawn. The reasoning behind this decision is that the petitioner, as the party initiating the legal action, has the right to withdraw their case if they no longer wish to pursue it. The Court's role in such instances is to record the withdrawal and close the proceedings. No specific findings were made on the merits of any underlying GST dispute, as the case was disposed of on the petitioner's request for withdrawal.
Facts
The petitioner, M/s Bajrang Wire Products India Private Limited, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Rajasthan, Bench at Jaipur. The petition was filed against the Union of India, the Commissioner of Central Goods and Service Tax, the Commissioner of Rajasthan Goods and Service Tax, and the Goods and Services Tax Network (GSTN). The specific order or action under challenge and the tax period(s) are not detailed in the provided judgment excerpt. The amount in dispute is also not stated. The procedural history is limited to the filing of the writ petition.
Key Issues
The primary issue before the Court was whether to permit the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition. The petitioner's counsel submitted a request for withdrawal. The respondents, represented by their respective counsel, did not present any arguments against the withdrawal. The Court was therefore called upon to decide whether to allow the withdrawal of the petition. No specific provisions of the CGST/SGST Act or Rules were explicitly discussed in relation to the withdrawal request itself.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 5543/2019 M/s Bajrang Wire Products India Private Limited, Having Its Principal Address At E-762A, Road Number 9F-1, V.K.I. Area, Jaipur-302013 And Through Its Whole Time Director Mr. Ashish Maheshwari ----Petitioner Versus
The Union Of India, Through Secretary, Ministry Of Finance, Department Of Revenue, North Block, New Delhi-110001. 2. The Commissioner, Central Goods And Service Tax, New Central Revenue Building, Statue Circle, Jaipur 302001. 3. The Commissioner, Rajasthan Goods And Service Tax, Kar Bhawan, Ambedkar Circle, Jaipur 302001. 4. Goods And Services Tax Network (GSTN), East Wing, 4Th Floor, Word Mark, I, Aerocity, New Delhi- 110037 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ramesh Chandra Agarwal, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Kinshuk Jain, Advocate for CGST Department HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA KUMAR SONGARA Judgment / Order 30/07/2020 Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw the petition. Dismissed as withdrawn. (CHANDRA KUMAR SONGARA),J (SABINA),J Mohita /42
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Rajasthan High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.