M/S Raghubala Construction Co. vs. Union Of INDIA

Original PDF →
CW/11954/2024HC RajasthanGSTCNR RJHC02061875202431 January 2025Bench: AVNEESH JHINGAN,SHUBHA MEHTA1 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

Facts

M/s Raghubala Construction Co. filed a writ petition before the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan, Bench at Jaipur. The petitioner, represented by its partner Mr. Sunil Kumar Garg, challenged an order or action passed by the revenue authorities. The respondents included the Union of India through the Commissioner (Appeals) Central Excise and CGST, the Assistant/Deputy Commissioner, CGST, Division-H, Kota, and the State of Rajasthan through the Chief Commissioner, Commercial Tax Department. The specific tax period(s) and the amount in dispute are not recorded in the judgment. The procedural history leading to the writ petition is also not detailed.

Held

The Court allowed the petitioner's request to withdraw the writ petition. The petitioner sought permission to withdraw the case with the liberty to pursue alternative remedies available under the law. The Court, in its order, dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn and granted the liberty as prayed for by the petitioner. No findings were made on the merits of any GST-related issues, as the case did not proceed to that stage. The operative direction was to dismiss the petition as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to pursue other legal avenues.

Key Issues

The primary issue before the Court was whether the petitioner should be allowed to withdraw the writ petition. The petitioner's counsel sought permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to avail remedies in accordance with law. The respondents' counsel were present. The judgment does not record any specific arguments from the respondents regarding the withdrawal or any substantive legal arguments from either side concerning the merits of the case, as the petition was withdrawn at the outset. Therefore, the Court was not required to decide any questions of law or mixed law and fact related to GST provisions or the actions of the revenue authorities.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

[2025:RJ-JP:4406-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11954/2024 M/s Raghubala Construction Co., 2-N-1, Dadabari, Kota, Rajasthan-324009 Through Its Partner Mr. Sunil Kumar Garg, S/o Mr. Raghuveer Dayal, Aged About 66 Years, 797, Dadabari, Kota, Rajasthan-324009. ----Petitioner Versus

1.

Union Of India, Through The Commissioner (Appeals) Central Excise And CGST, G-105, New Industrial Area, Opp. Diesel Shed, Basni, Jodhpur (Raj.).

2.

The Assistant/deputy Commissioner, CGST, Division-H, Central Revenue Building C.A.D Circle, Dadabari Road, Kota-324009. 3. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Chief Commissioner, Commerical Tax Department, Kar Bhawan, Ambedkar Circle, Jaipur-302004. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Ravi Gupta, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr.Sandeep Pathak, Adv. Mr.Kartikeya Sharma, Adv. for Mr.Sandeep Taneja, AAG. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA Order 31/01/2025

1.

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to avail remedies in accordance with law.

2.

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. (SHUBHA MEHTA), J (AVNEESH JHINGAN), J Himanshu Soni/133

Reproduced from the public record of the Rajasthan High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.