M/S. Devans Modern Breweries LTD vs. Union Of INDIA
Original PDF →Facts
M/s. Devans Modern Breweries Ltd. (the petitioner) filed a writ petition before the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan, Bench at Jaipur. During the pendency of this petition, an order was passed pursuant to an impugned show-cause notice. The petitioner's counsel submitted that the writ petition was withdrawn because liberty to challenge the subsequent order was not specifically sought. The respondents did not raise serious objections to this submission. The Court was considering an application to modify a previous order.
Held
The Court modified its previous order dated 28.01.2025. The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn. However, the Court granted liberty to the petitioner to avail remedies in accordance with law against the order that was passed in pursuance to the impugned show-cause notice. This decision acknowledges that the petitioner's original challenge was rendered moot by the subsequent order, but provides a pathway for them to challenge that new order through appropriate legal channels, rather than being precluded by the withdrawal of the initial writ petition. The application before the Court was disposed of.
Key Issues
1. Whether the writ petition, initially filed challenging a show-cause notice, should be dismissed as withdrawn when a subsequent order has been passed pursuant to that notice, and liberty to challenge the subsequent order was not explicitly sought at the time of withdrawal? Petitioner's Argument: The petitioner contended that the writ petition was withdrawn because an order had been passed in pursuance to the impugned show-cause notice during the pendency of the petition. They argued that liberty to challenge this subsequent order was not requested, implying a procedural oversight or a strategic decision to withdraw based on the new development. Respondents' Argument: The respondents' counsel raised no serious objections to the petitioner's submission regarding the withdrawal of the writ petition and the liberty to pursue remedies.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
Order 22/04/2025
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the writ petition was withdrawn as during the pendency of the petition the order in pursuance to the impugned show-cause notice was
[2025:RJ-JP:16838-DB] (2 of 2) [WMAP-33/2025] passed. The contention is that liberty to challenge the order was not asked for.
Learned counsel for respondent raises no serious objection.
The order dated 28.01.2025 is accordingly modified to the extent that the writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to avail remedies in accordance with law against the order passed in pursuance to the impugned show-cause notice.
The application is disposed of. (SHUBHA MEHTA),J (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J LAKSHYA/CHANDAN/3
Reproduced from the public record of the Rajasthan High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.