M/S. Kalu Ram vs. State Of Rajasthan

CW/12114/2026HC RajasthanGSTCNR RJHC02064981202611 August 2026Bench: ARUN MONGA,ASHUTOSH KUMAR5 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

Held

The High Court condoned the delay in filing the appeal, finding the reasons for the delay to be beyond the petitioner's control. The Court directed the Appellate Authority to entertain the appeal on merits after the petitioner deposits 50% of the outstanding tax amount.

Facts

The petitioner faced a delay of 645 days in filing an appeal against an Order-in-Original due to alleged non-service of the order. The Appellate Authority dismissed the appeal solely on the grounds of limitation, lacking the power to condone such delay.

Key Issues

Whether the delay in filing an appeal due to non-service of the Order-in-Original can be condoned, and if the Appellate Authority can be directed to hear the appeal on merits.

Sections Cited

Section 74, Section 107

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

[2026:RJ-JP:31425-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12114/2026 CNR: RJHC020649812026 | URN: CW / 26777U / 2026 M/s. Kalu Ram, Registered Office At B-2/444, Chitrakoot, Vaishali Na- gar, Jaipur, 302021 Through Its Proprietor Kalu Ram S/o Banshi Lal Aged About 49 Years R/o Rajeev Colony, Mangra Punjla, Jodhpur - 342001 ----Petitioner Versus

1.

State Of Rajasthan, Through Chief Commissioner, State Taxes, Kar Bhawan, Ambedkar Circle, Jaipur

2.

Assistant Commissioner, Circle- B, Jaipur - III, Ward - II, State Goods And Services Tax, Bhagwan Das Road, C-Scheme, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

3.

Appellate Authority – III, State Taxes, Office Of Appellate Au- thority, Jaipur - III, Kar Bhawan, Jaipur

4.

Union Of India, Through Secretary, Department Of Finance, New Delhi - 110001. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Pratyushi Mehta, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Mahi Yadav, AAG with Ms. Chelsi Agarwal, AAAG Ms. Apurva Maharishi, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR Order(Oral) 11/08/2026 Per: Arun Monga, J.

1.

The petitioner herein, inter alia, seeks quashing and setting aside of the impug

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Rajasthan High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.