M/S. Anand Minerals And Chemical vs. The State Of Rajasthan

CW/9062/2026HC RajasthanGSTCNR RJHC02045678202618 August 2026Bench: ARUN MONGA,ASHUTOSH KUMAR5 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

Held

The Court held that non-adjudication on merits would cause grave injury, especially considering the reasons for the delay were beyond the petitioner's control. The Court agreed with the Punjab and Haryana High Court's view on service of notices and appeals.

Facts

The petitioner's appeal against an Order-in-Original raising a GST demand was dismissed by the Appellate Authority due to a 159-day delay. The petitioner claimed the delay was due to non-service of the Show Cause Notice and Order-in-Original on the GST portal.

Key Issues

Whether the Appellate Authority can condone delay in filing an appeal when notices were allegedly not properly served, and whether non-adjudication on merits is justified.

Sections Cited

Section 74, Section 75(4), Section 107(1)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

[2026:RJ-JP:32852-DB] (1 of 5) [CW-9062/2026] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9062/2026 CNR: RJHC020456782026 | URN: CW / 20061U / 2026 M/s. Anand Minerals And Chemical, Through Its Proprietor, Sh. Surjeet Singh Jodha, S/o. Sh. Sajjan Singh, Aged About 28 Years, Resident Of Dr. Sajjan Singh Colony, Chhawani Railway Fatak Ke Bahar, Beawar, District- Ajmer (Raj.) Having Gstin No. 08Bgypj2209K1Zx. ----Petitioner Versus

1.

The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Commissioner, Commercial Taxes Department, Rajasthan, Kar Bhawan, Ambedkar Circle, Bhawani Singh Road, C-Scheme, Jaipur -302021, Rajasthan.

2.

The Appellate Authority (P.C. Verma), Office Of The Appellate Authority, Commercial Tax Department, Ajmer, Rajasthan.

3.

The Assistant Commissioner (State Tax), Circle-A, Ward-1, Beawar, Kar Bhawan, Opp. Saket Nagar Police Chouki, Beawar (Raj.).

4.

Union Of India, Through Secretary, Finance Department, Government Of India, New Delhi ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Ms. Mahi Yadav, AAG with Ms. Chelsi Agarwal, AAAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH K

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Rajasthan High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.