Tusharanshu Singhal S/O Shri Banwari Lal Singhal vs. Union Of INDIA

CRLMB/13115/2026HC RajasthanGSTCNR RJHC02080599202614 September 2026Bench: FARJAND ALI6 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

Held

The Court held that bail provisions are not punitive or preventive, and the gravity of the allegation or quantum involved cannot be the sole consideration for declining bail. It noted that the evidence is documentary and electronic, the investigation is substantially complete, and no further recovery or custodial interrogation is required.

Facts

The petitioner was arrested in connection with an investigation into alleged wrongful availment and passing on of Input Tax Credit amounting to approximately Rs. 13.21 Crores. The case involved search proceedings, seizure of documents and electronic records, and recording of statements.

Key Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail given the nature of evidence, completion of investigation, and absence of criminal antecedents. The court also considered whether continued incarceration is necessary for recovery of alleged tax liability.

Sections Cited

Section 132, Section 69

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
[2026:RJ-JP:36933] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13115/2026 CNR: RJHC020805992026 | URN: CRLMB / 24245U / 2026 Tusharanshu Singhal S/o Shri Banwari Lal Singhal, Aged About 28 Years, Resident Of Sector No. 4,shastrinagar, G.t. Road, Dholpur, Rajasthan ( At Present Lodged In Judicial Custody At The Central Jail Jaipur, And In Custody Since 02-07-2026) ----Petitioner Versus Union Of India, Through The Inspecotr/authorised Officer, Central Goods And Services Tax Commissionerate, Alwar Rajasthan. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ravi Gupta, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Chandra Shekhar Sinha, Adv. Mr. Jitendra Singh Rathore, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI

Order 14/09/2026 1.The instant criminal misc. bail application under Section 483 of BNSS has been preferred on behalf of the accused-petitioner, Tusharanshu Singhal, who is in custody in connection with case no.GEXCOM/AE/INV/GST/6446/2026-AE-O/OCOMMR-CGST,ALWAR registered at the Office of the Central Goods and Services Tax Commissionerate, Alwar for the offence under Section 132 of CGST Act, 2017. 2. Briefly stated

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Rajasthan High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.