The Union Of INDIA vs. M/S Sms Smelters Limited
Held
The Court held that the applicant, the Union of India, was no longer interested in pursuing the Interlocutory Application. This conclusion was based on the consistent absence of the applicant's counsel for five consecutive hearings and the failure to take necessary steps for serving notice on the respondent, M/s SMS Smelters Limited. Consequently, the Court dismissed the IA for non-prosecution. The operative direction was the dismissal of the interlocutory application. No specific provisions of the GST Act or Rules were discussed in relation to the merits of the case, as the dismissal was purely procedural.
Facts
This matter concerns an Interlocutory Application (IA) filed before the Gauhati High Court, Itanagar Bench. The applicant is the Union of India, represented by the Commissioner, CGST and Customs, Itanagar Commissionerate. The respondent is M/s SMS Smelters Limited. The application has been listed for hearing on multiple occasions, and for the last five times, the applicant has remained unrepresented. Furthermore, no steps have been taken by the applicant to serve notice upon the sole respondent. The Court noted this lack of representation and action.
Key Issues
The primary issue before the Court was whether the Interlocutory Application (IA) filed by the Union of India should be dismissed. The Court had to decide if the applicant's persistent absence and failure to take steps for service of notice indicated a lack of interest in pursuing the application. The Union of India, as the applicant, was expected to present its case and ensure proper service on the respondent. M/s SMS Smelters Limited, as the respondent, was not recorded as having made any arguments in this specific proceeding, likely due to the applicant's non-appearance.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
ORDER Date : 02.07.2026 (K. Ete, J.)
None appears for the applicant on call. It is noticed that, for the last 5(five) occasions, the applicant remained unrepresented, and no steps have been taken for service of notice upon the sole respondent.
Page No.# 2/2 Considering the above, we are of the view that the applicant is no longer interested to pursue this interlocutory application and accordingly, the same stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Gauhati High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.