Manju Singh vs. The Union Of INDIA
Original PDF →Facts
The petitioner, Manju Singh, filed a writ petition before the Patna High Court. The respondents were the Union of India, the Principal Chief Commissioner of CGST, the State of Bihar through its Commissioner of State Taxes, and the Assistant Commissioner of State Taxes, Siwan. The specific tax period, the order or action under challenge, the authority that passed it, and the amount in dispute are not recorded in the provided text. The procedural history leading to the filing of the writ petition is also not detailed.
Held
The Court held that the writ petition could be withdrawn. The reasoning was based on the petitioner's request for withdrawal and the lack of objection from the respondent-State. The ratio decidendi is that a writ petition can be dismissed as not pressed if the petitioner wishes to withdraw it and the respondents have no objection. The operative direction was to dismiss the writ petition as not pressed.
Key Issues
The Court had to decide whether to allow the withdrawal of the writ petition. The petitioner's counsel sought to withdraw the petition. The respondent-State's counsel had no objection to the withdrawal. No specific legal questions or arguments from either side regarding GST provisions or the merits of the case are recorded.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH) 2 13-03-2026 The Ld. Counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present writ petition, to which the Ld. Counsel for the respondent-State has got no objection.
Accordingly, the present writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.
S.Sb/- (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) (Arun Kumar Jha, J) U
Reproduced from the public record of the Patna High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.