Commissioner Of Central CGST And Central Excise, Patna I vs. M/S Shree Mahavira Buildwell PVT. LTD.

MA/81/2026HC PatnaGSTCNR BRHC01005022202612 August 2026Bench: MR. JUSTICE NANI TAGIA,MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA1 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

Held

The Court granted the appellant's request to withdraw the miscellaneous appeal. The reasoning provided is that the appellant's counsel sought permission to withdraw after initial arguments. Consequently, the Court accorded permission and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn. The Court also granted liberty to the appellant to file the appeal afresh, implying that the withdrawal is not a final adjudication on the merits of the case. No specific legal principles were established, and the decision is based on the procedural request of the appellant.

Facts

The appellant, Commissioner of Central CGST and Central Excise, Patna I, filed a miscellaneous appeal before the Patna High Court against M/s Shree Mahavira Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. The specific tax period(s) and the amount in dispute are not recorded in the judgment. The appeal was filed against an order or action by an unspecified authority. The procedural history leading to this appeal is not detailed.

Key Issues

The Court had to decide whether to grant the appellant's request to withdraw the miscellaneous appeal. The appellant, represented by Mr. Anshuman Singh, sought permission to withdraw the appeal after some arguments were presented. The respondent's arguments are not recorded as the matter was concluded by the appellant's request for withdrawal. No specific legal provisions or precedents were discussed in relation to the withdrawal request.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Appeal No.81 of 2026 ====================================================== Commissioner of Central CGST and Central Excise, Patna I ... ... Appellant/s Versus M/s Shree Mahavira Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Anshuman Singh, Advocate Mr. Ranjay Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NANI TAGIA and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA

ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NANI TAGIA) 3 12-08-2026 After some arguments, Mr. Anshuman Singh, learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw present miscellaneous appeal.

2.

Permission is accorded.

3.

Accordingly, instant miscellaneous appeal is hereby dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the appellant to file afresh.

deepak/- (Nani Tagia, J) ( Alok Kumar Sinha, J) U

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Patna High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.