Ashok vs. The Union Of INDIA
Held
The Court granted the petitioner's request to withdraw the writ petition. The Court accorded permission for withdrawal and, by granting the liberty sought by the petitioner to pursue remedies in accordance with law, dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn. There were no orders as to costs. Any miscellaneous applications pending in the writ petition were also closed. The specific legal arguments regarding the CAT's inaction or the merits of the inquiry were not adjudicated upon as the petition was withdrawn.
Facts
The petitioner, Ashok, a retired Chief Commissioner of CGST, filed a writ petition before the Telangana High Court. The petition challenged the inaction of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Hyderabad Bench, in passing interim orders in OA No. 665 of 2024. This inaction allegedly prevented the interdiction of an inquiry initiated by an order dated 13.12.2023 (F. No C-14011/10/2022-Ad.VII/3551). The petitioner sought to declare the CAT's inaction as arbitrary, illegal, biased, and violative of natural justice, and consequently sought to interdict further inquiry proceedings. An interim application was also filed seeking a stay on further proceedings pending the disposal of the writ petition.
Key Issues
1. Whether the inaction of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Hyderabad Bench, in passing interim orders in OA No. 665 of 2024, thereby failing to interdict an inquiry, is arbitrary, illegal, biased, and violative of the principles of natural justice, as argued by the petitioner? 2. Whether further inquiry proceedings initiated by the order dated 13.12.2023 (F. No C-14011/10/2022-Ad.VII/3551) should be interdicted, as sought by the petitioner? The petitioner argued that the CAT's inaction was arbitrary, illegal, biased, and violated principles of natural justice, leading to the need to interdict the inquiry. The respondents' arguments were not recorded in the judgment.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
[ 3413 ] IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (SPecial Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY WRIT PETITION NO :25567 OF 2024 Between: Ashok, S/o Sri T.B,Chari, Aged 61 Years, Occ Chief Commissioner CGST (Rtd ), Resident of Flat No. 301, Barkatpura, Hyderabad-500027 Royal Elegance Apartment, House No, 3-4-138, ...PETITIONER AND 1 TheUnionoflndia,Rep.byitssecretaryMinistryofFinance'Departmentof Revenue North Block, New Delhi-110001 Ms. Seema Arora, (Present Head and Chairman- of Enquiry Committee)' princioal Director General Directorate General of Goods and Servrces lax. sin rlboi, ufNL Building, 8, Bhikaji cama Place, New Delhi - 110 066 rva (Former Head and Chairman of Enquiry Committee) 6omhiss,oner (Retired), H No. 828, Sector l5 Faridabad. 2
Smt. Mallika A Principal Chief Haryana
Ms. Simmi Jain, Principal Commissioner of Customs ACC (lmport), New Customs House, Near lGl Airport, New Delhi '110 037 '
Sri Pranesh Pathak, Principal Additional Director General, qirectorate General - oi
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Telangana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.