Girijesh Kumar Chaudhary vs. The Assistant Commissioner

Original PDF →
WP/37158/2024HC TelanganaGSTCNR HBHC01072389202403 January 2025Bench: SUJOY PAUL,G.RADHA RANI4 pages
For Petitioner: SRI THANNERU CHAITANYA KUMAR, Respondent No.1 & 3: SRI SWAROOP OORILLA, SPL. GP FOR STATE TAX, Respondent No.2: SRI B.MUKHERJEE, REP. FOR, SRI GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR, DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERIAL OF ]NDIA, Respondent No.4: SRI DOMINIC FERNANDES, Sr. SC FOR CBIC

No AI summary yet for this judgment.

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
HIGH COURT FOR,THE STATE OF TELA,NGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL AND THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G.RADHA RANI Between: I Girijesh Kumar Chaudhary, S/o. Ramdahin Chaudhary Aged about 5'1 years, Occ. Business Rl"/o. Plot No. 3974, Subhash Nagar, lDA, Jeedimetla, Hyderabad, Ranga Reddy, Telangana, lndia Financial Year. 2018-'19 ...PETITIONER AND 1. The Assistant Commissioner, State/UT Jeedimetla-|, Hyderabad Rural, 2nd Floor, Gagan Vihar, Nampally, Hyderabad Telangana 2. Union of lndia, Ministry of Finance, Represent by its Secretary North Block, New Delhi-l 10 001 . 3. State of Telangana, Through Principal Secretary to Government Revenue Department (Commercial Tax) Hyderabad, Telangana. 4. The Central Board of lndirect Taxes and Customs, GST Policy Wing, New Delhi Rep by its Commissioner ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to a) a writ, order, or direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring impugned Order vide Ref No. 2D360424O68085C dated 27.O4.2024 passed by the 1st Respondent under the provisions of CGST/TGST Acl, 2017 as being void, arbitrar!, illegal, without jurisdiction, violative of the principles of natural justice apart from being violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 265 of the Constitution of lndia, and to consequently set aside the same and a [ 3430 ] WRIT PETITION NO: 37158 OF 2024 pass such further or other order(s) as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. b) a writ, order, or direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring that the Notification No. 09/2023-C.T dated 31.03.2023 issued by Respondent No.3 through Respondent No.4 and corresponding GO Ms. No. 118 dated 25.08.2023 issued by Respondent No.3, which extended the time limit for passing the orders, are without authority of law and ultra vires to the section 73(10) of the GST Act 2017 and Section 168A of GST Act, 2O17 and violative of articles 1a, 19(1Xg) 21 and 265 of the Constitution of lndia. lA NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay operation of Order vide Ref No. 2D360424068085C daled 27.04.2024 passed by Respondent No. '1 in DRC-07. Counsel for the Counsel for the Counsel for the Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI THANNERU CHAITANYA KUMAR Respondent No.1 & 3: SRI SWAROOP OORILLA, SPL. GP FOR STATE TAX Respondent No.2: SRI B.MUKHERJEE, REP. FOR SRI GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR, DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERIAL OF ]NDIA Respondent No.4: SRI DOMINIC FERNANDES, Sr. SC FOR CBIC The Court made the following: ORDER , I THE HONOURABLE SRT .'USTICE SUJOY PAUL AND THE HON,BLE DT. JUSTICE G. RADIIA RANI WRIT PETITION No.37158 of 2O24

ORDER (per Hon'ble SP,J) Sri Thanneru Chaitanya Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner; Sri Swaroop Oorilla, learned Special Government Pleader for State Tax, for respondent Nos. 1 and 3, Sri B. Mukherjee, learned counsel representing Sri Gadi Praveen Kumar, learned Deputy Solicitor General of India, for respondent No.2 and Sri Dominic Fernandes, learned Senior Standing Counsel for CBIC, for respondent No.4 2 4 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw this petition with the liberty to hle a properly constituted petition The other side has no objection Accordingly, lhis Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn I with the liberty prayed for. No costs Interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall also stand .T. TIRUMALA DEVI ASSIS T EGISTRAR //// N OFFICER One CC to SRI THANNERU CHAITANYA KUMAR, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to SRI DOMINIC FERNANDES, Sr. SC FOR CBIC [OPUC] One CC to SRI GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR, DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERIAL Of tfttOn, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OPUC] Two CCs to SPL. GP FOR STATE TAX, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT] Two CD Copies ,/ To, 1. 2. 3. 4 5 + BSR BS I I I

HIGH COURT DATED: 0310112025 ORDER WP.No.37158 of 2024 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN, WITHOUT COSTS g /.t t ''J$ltr, S ,'A1 e Ht .:l o 1A Ffi 2IJ?5 ((.( I ( t :2',

Reproduced from the public record of the Telangana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.