M/S. Royal Cement And Hardware vs. Assistant Commissioner (St)

Original PDF →
WP/154/2025HC TelanganaGSTCNR HBHC01072116202406 January 2025Bench: SUJOY PAUL,G.RADHA RANI5 pages
For Petitioner: SRl. S. SURI BABUFor Respondent: SRI SWAROOP OORILLA, SPECIAL GP FOR STATE TAX

No AI summary yet for this judgment.

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
[ 3430 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL AND THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G.RADHA RANI Between: M/s. Royal Cement and Hardware, PL C2-4618,lndustrial Area, Auto Nagar, Nizambad, Telangana- 503 001, represented by its Proprietor, Sri Sliaik Nazeer. .,.PETITIONER Assistant Commissioner (ST), Bhodan, Nizamabad - tll Circle, Nizamabad. The State of Telangana, represented by its Principal Secretary, -Revelue Department (Commercial Taxes), Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabid. ...RESPONDENTS AND Petition under Article 226 ol the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased ..to issue a Writ or order or direction pa(icularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the first respondent in passing the impugned Assessment Order under Section 73 of the CGST Act, 2017 / TGST"11 {ct,2017, in Form GST DRC - 07, in ARN No.AD3605220195547, read with Summary of the Order under Section 74, in Form GST DRC - 07, vide Reference No.2D36084241365439, dated 30.08.2024, thereby levied tax amounting to Rs.6,67,677l-, (CGST amounting to Rs.3,33,838/- SGST amounting to Rs.3,33,838/-), for the tax period 2019-20, without following the due procedure pf ---,;.r-- - law contemplated under Section 65 read with Section 73 of the CGST Act, 2017 / TGST Act, 2017, as beyond the time prescnbed under Section 73(10) of the CGST Act, 2017 / TGST Act, 2017. in consequence of G.O.Ms.No.118. dated 25.O8.2023 and G.O.Ms.No.170, dated 30.12.2023. issued by the Government of Telangana, are illegal, ultra vires Section 168 A of the CGST Act. 2017 / TGST 1 2 WRIT PETITION NO: 154 OF 2025 I' Acl, 2017 / IGST Act, 2017, irrational, arbitrary, unreasonable. violative of Article 14 of the constitution of lndia, barred by Limitation and without jurisdiction lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 'r s'r cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to pending disposal of the writ petition grant stay of all further proceedings arising in pursuance of the impugned Assessment order passed by the first respondent under Section 73 of the CGST Act, 20i 7 / TGST Act, 2O1t , in Form GST DRC _ 07, in ARN No.AD3605220195547, read with Summary of the Order under section 74, in Form GST DRC - 07, vide Reference No.2D36084241365439, dated 30.08.2024 for the tax period 2O19-2O Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. S. SURI BABU Counsel for the Respondents: SRI SWAROOP OORILLA, SPECIAL GP FOR STATE TAX

The Court made tl.re following: ORDER l t I

/' THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL AND THE HON,BLE DT. JUSTICE G. RADHA RANI WRIT PETITION No.154 of 2O25 ORDER (per Hon'ble SP,J) \ Sri S. Suri Babu, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Swaroop Oorilla, learned Special Government Pleader for State Tax, for the respondents.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner at the outset submits that this matter is covered by recent order passed by this Court in W.P.No.2123 of 2O24 and batch and it may be disposed of in same. terms.

3.

The other side has no objection.

4.

Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of by reserving liberty to the petitioner to avail the remedy of statutory appeal. If the appeal is preferred by the petitioner within 45 days from today before the appellate authority, the said authority shall consider and decide the appeal on merits and it shall not be throu'n overboard on the ground of limitation. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case. There shall be no order as to costs. 1 I

I 2 1 closed. Interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall also s1616 P.Ch. NAGABHUS ASSISTANT REG BA //// TRAR FFICER To, Ij)""fl:?:f 't co m missioner (Sr), Bhoda n, Nizamabad ; :;:: - trdg35flrygfiffi++.l;i::ffil:* iff 33 &,i5J t sunt dAeu', Advocate topucl GJP (fi- I J 4. i ll Ii l 5 6

HIGH COURT DATED:0610112025 ..'; .) t" _ vl.' ORDER DISPOSINCi OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS l*- s: o :A tjlr i nt.St'{ ''\C41"-l-1 I WP.No.154 of 2025 _6v_2,t

Reproduced from the public record of the Telangana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.