M/S. Ramu Hanumanthu vs. The Joint Commissioner (St)

Original PDF →
WP/12945/2024HC TelanganaGSTCNR HBHC01024601202407 March 2025Bench: SUJOY PAUL,RENUKA YARA4 pages
For Respondent: SRI P. SRI HAESHA AGP REP, SRI SWAROOP OORILLA, SPECIAL GOVT PLEADER FOR STATE TAX

No AI summary yet for this judgment.

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
[ 3446 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY ,THE SEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE RENUKA YARA WRIT PETITION NO 29450F 2024 Between: AND M/s. Ramu Hanumanthu, 1-38, Kamanchikal, Khammam, Telangana- 507003 CSftN-aOnOlpHO626B1Z2 Rep by its Proprietor Hanumanthu Ramu ...PETITIONER 1. The Joint Commissioner (ST). Warangal Division,-Warangal . ^ 2. The Union of lndia, Rep. by its Secretary to Government, Department oI Revenue, Ministry of Finance, New Delhi. - 3. bA; ;f i;rangifia, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government' Revenue (CI-ll) Department, Seiretariat, Hyderabad ...RES'ONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to kindly issue an appropriate writ, order or Direction more particularly in the nature of IvIANDAMUS declaring the action of the 1st Respondent in passing the impugned order vide Reference Number 2D3602220122731, dated 2.3.2024 as iltegal and violative of Articles 14, 1 I (1) (g) and 300A of the constitution and further declare that the Notifications Nos.35/2020 central Tax dated 03.04-2020, 14t2021 Central Tax dated 0',I .05.2021 , 1312022 Central Tax dated 05.o7.2022' 9t2023 Cenlral Tax dated 31 .03.2023 and 56t2023 Central Tax dated 28.12.2023 as contrary to Section 1684 of the GST Acts. lt is also prayed to declare that the limilation specified in Section 16 (4) of the GST Acts is only procedural in nature and that section 16 (2) has overriding effect on section 16 (4) while claiming eligible input laxl17 lhe respective monthly GSTR 38 return IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in sLrpport of the petition, the High court may be pleased to order stay of collection of CGST of Rs 43,76'813, SGST of Rs'43,76'813' CGST interest of Rs.38'07 827, SGST interest of Rs,38,07'827, CGST penalty of Rs.4,37,681 and SGSI penalty of Rs.4,37,681 counset for the Petitioner: sRl. MUKTINUTALAPATI RAMACHANDRA MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1&3: SRI P. SRI HAESHA AGP REP SRI SWAROOP OORILLA, SPECIAL GOVT PLEADER FOR STATE TAX Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR, DY. SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA

The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL AND THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE RENUI(A YARA IIRIT PETITION No. 12945 of 2o24 ORDER per the Hon'bte the Acting Chtef Justice Sujog paut): Sri M. Ramachaldra Murthy, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to avail appropriate remedy available under law. A letter, dated O3.O3.2O25, is also filed in the Registry to that effect. Prayer is allowed

3.

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty prayed for. No costs. Interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall also stand closed. 2 S MOHD. ISMAIL STANT REGISTRAR To, //// SECTION OFFTCER l One CC to SRI MUKTINUTALAPATI RAMACHANDRA MURTHY' Advocate ,. [oJJc%t to SPECIAL GoVER.NIIENT PLEADER' Hish Court for the state . S.-;$tfli'3$"lAt#JPH[]*u*o*, Dy solrcrroR GENERAL oF rNDlAloPUCl

4.

Two CD CoPies BM BS

HIGH COURT DATED:0710312025 ORDER WP.No.12945 ot 2024 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS AV \3I{ 2,\ 13i{AH ?ffi o D * iCC /rT Ct ESP ( TA s E r r{ e- a t D

Reproduced from the public record of the Telangana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.