M/S.Telangana Recycling Private Limited vs. The State Of Telangana
Original PDF →Facts
M/s. Telangana Recycling Pvt. Ltd. (Petitioner) filed a writ petition before the High Court for the State of Telangana challenging an order dated 17.04.2025 passed by the Deputy State Tax Officer (2nd Respondent). This order cancelled the Petitioner's GST registration certificate, bearing GSTIN 36AALCT2319K2Z1. The Petitioner sought a writ of mandamus to declare the cancellation illegal, arbitrary, high-handed, contrary to the CGST Act, 2017, and in violation of natural justice, praying for the order to be set aside. The Petitioner also filed an interim application seeking suspension of the impugned order pending the disposal of the writ petition, stating that irreparable loss and hardship would be caused otherwise. The State of Telangana and the Deputy State Tax Officer were the Respondents.
Held
The Court did not decide the merits of the case. The learned counsel for the Petitioner, Sri B. Krishna Reddy, sought to withdraw the writ petition. The Petitioner requested liberty to file a properly constituted petition. The Court allowed this prayer. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty granted to the Petitioner. No costs were imposed. Any pending miscellaneous petitions were also closed.
Key Issues
1. Whether the action of the 2nd Respondent in passing the impugned order dated 17.04.2025 for cancellation of the Petitioner's registration certificate is illegal, arbitrary, high-handed, contrary to the provisions of the CGST Act, 2017, and in violation of the principles of natural justice? Petitioner's Contention: The Petitioner argued that the cancellation order was illegal, arbitrary, high-handed, contrary to the CGST Act, 2017, and violated principles of natural justice. They sought to have the order declared null and void. The Petitioner also sought interim relief to suspend the operation of the cancellation order to prevent irreparable loss and hardship. Respondents' Contention: The judgment does not record any specific arguments made by the Respondents. The Special Government Pleader for State Tax appeared for the Respondents.
Sections Cited
CGST Act, 2017
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
The Court made the I'ollowing: ORDER
THE HON'BLE THE ACTING.CHIEF JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL rHE H.N,BLE sMr.}il3rr"" REN,KA 'ARA WRIT PETITION No- 1369Oof D 2o2s (Per the Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice Sujog paul) Sri B.Krishna Reddy, learned counsel seeks to withdraw this writ petition with ORDER: (# petrtioner to file a properly constituted petition.
The prayer is allowed.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty prayed for. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand crosed.. for the petitioner, the liberty to the N. SRIHARI PUry REGISTRAR To, //II ECTION OFF]CER 1 2 Two CCs to Sp One CC to SRI ECIAL GOVERNM B. KRISHNA RED ENT PLEADE DY, Advocate RF to TATE TAX High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT] Two CD Copie 3 BM LS S
HIGH COURT DATED:021051',2025 , rl rA c 16. c -d o o (O( U 2 u ,t,ttt 2P5 !' o \:-- * -lir'7, 'ttt' ORDER WP.No.13690 of 2025 DISMISSINGTHEWRITPETITIoNASWITI{I)RAWN WITHOUT COSTS w. )t ls ),-,
Reproduced from the public record of the Telangana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.