Renewable Energy Systems Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Tax
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
The Court made the following: ORDER
KUMAR SINGII THE 3. Learned Senior Standing Counsei for Central Board oflndirectTaxesandCustomsappearingforrespondent No.1 has opposed the prayer also on the grounds of delay' CIIIEF JUSTICE SRI I I TIIE HON'BLE AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G.M.MOHII'DDIN WRIT PETITION No.23307 of 2025 ORDER: Heard Sri E.Rakesh Reddy' learned counsel for the petitioner' Also Senior Standing heard Sri Dominic Fernandes' learned Counsel for Central Board of Indirect TaxesarrdCustoms,whoappeafedforrespondentNo.l through video conferencing' and Sri A'S'Vasudevan' learned counsel for respondent No'2'
The petitioner is aggrieved by the order-in-original dated23.02.2025relatingtothetaxperiod2o2o-2o2| passed by respondent No'1' The petitioner has taken a number of pleas' However' it has bypassed the alternative remedy of appeal by approaching the writ court a-fter some delay. I l ri i1 il li li rl I I I .
2 :' He further submits that the order-in-original is digitalty srgned. The summary of the show cause notice also carries the signature of the assessing authority.
Learned counsel for the petitioner, therefore, prays that the petitioner may be allowed to approach the appellate authorit5z and raise all such grounds of law and facts in its appeal. He further submits that the appellate authority may be directed to consider the question of delav sympathetically, as the petitioner has approached this Court in the present writ petition.
In the aforesaid entering into the merits crrcumstances, of the matter we relrain from If the petitioner approaches the appellate authority with statutory pre_ deposit within a period of ten days, the appellate authorier sha-ll consider the question of delay sympathetically and take a decision on the appear in accordance with law. 6 The instant writ petition is accordingly disposed of However, there shall be no order as to costs. i
3 Miscellaneous appiications pending, if any' shall stand ciosed. 1- The Assistant Commissioner of Central Hyderabad, Telangana'
The Secretary, Ministry of Finance' No'136 of lndia. I::,."fil:1o,if o :,?"J:11 g,,B "Ff JiJlS"# N. SRIHARI DEPUTY REGISTRAR src$]fforprcEn Tax, Jeedimetla GST Division' -A, North Block' New Delhi' Union Revenue (CT-ll) DePartment' //// To, J. 4. 5 6 7 One CC to SRI EPPA RAKESH REDDY' Advocate IOPUCI One CC to SRI A S VASUDEVAN' SC FOR CENTRAL GOW IOPUCI One CC to SRI DOMINIC FERNANDES' Sr' SC FOR CBIC IOPUCI Two CCs to GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAXES' High Court for the State of +;;d;;'n HYderabad [oUrl Two CD CoPies o BSR LS
HIGH COURT DATED: 07l0gt2121 ORDER WP.No.23307 of 2O2S WITHOUT COSTS :\- * ,,' .). al) \.)\,// '' ...,-/' ':/ \\' ^, - '\.' ."." -,- ,... -i-.- 1 0 stP 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION, // /.
I
Reproduced from the public record of the Telangana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.