Aurobindo Pharma Limited vs. State Of Telangana

Original PDF →
WP/13708/2026HC TelanganaGSTCNR HBHC01028354202628 April 2026Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA13 pages
For Petitioner: SRI KAILASH NATH P S SFor Respondent: SPECIAL GOVT PLEADER FOR STATE TAX

No AI summary yet for this judgment.

Heard together (6 matters)

W.P.No.13698 OF 2026
W.P.No.13699 OF 2026
W.P.No.13708 OF 2026
W.P.No.13711 OF 2026
W.P.No.13715 OF 2026
W.P.No.13719 OF 2026

Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
134471 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENry EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA wRlT PETITIQN NOs: 13698, 13699, 13208, 13711,13715 & 13719 0F 2026 W.P.No.13698 OF 2026 Between: Aurobindo Pharma Limited, Plot No.'1 , Survey No.83/1, Galaxy Tower, Floor Nos. 22-24, Hyderabad Knowledge City Raidurg Panmaktha, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad - 500032, Telangana, lndia Rep by its Authorised Signatory, Mr. T. Deepak ...PETITIONER AND 1 . State of Telangana, Revenue (Commercial Tax) Department Rep by its Secretary. 2. Deputy Commissioner (ST), STU-1, Punjagutta Division, Hyderabad. 3. Appellate Joint Commissioner of State Tax, Punjagutta Division, Sth Floor, C.T. Complex, Nampally, Hyderabad ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Arlicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more appropriately in the nature of a writ of certiorari, calling for the records and quashing the order of the 3rd Respondent bearing order No. 2D36112s092003R dt.029.11.202b as being ilregar, arbitrary, and violative of the provisions of the central Goods and services Tax Act, 2011 , lhe lntegrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2o1z and the Goods and services Tax (Compensation to States) Acl,2017 and Articles 14 and 265 of the Constitution of lndia, and consequently. direct the Respondents to issue refund of Cess to the Petitioner of Rs 56,45.801t - for the tax period June 2023 made vide ARN AA360525055657V on 30.05 2025 l.A. NO: 2 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the rmpugned order of the 3rd Respondent bearing order No 2D361125092003R dt29.11 2025 Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI KAILASH NATH P S S Counsel for the Respondents: SPECIAL GOVT PLEADER FOR STATE TAX W.P.No.13699 OF 2026 Between: Aurobindo Pharma Limited, Plot No.'1 , Survey No.B3/1 , Galaxy Tower, Floor Nos 22- 24, Hyderabad Knowledge city Raidurg Panmaktha, Serilingampally tttlandal, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad - 500032, Telangana, lndia Rep by its Authorised Signatory, Mr. T Deepak ...PETITIONER AND 1. State of Telangana, Revenue (Commercial Tax) Department Rep by its Secretary. 2. Deputy Commrssioner (ST) STU-1 Punjagutta Division' Hyderabad' 3. Appellate Joint Commissioner of State Tax' Punjagutta Division' Sth Floor' C.T. ComPtex, NamPallY, HYderabad ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Artrcle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the Circumstancesstatedntheaffidavitfiledtherewith,theHighcourtmaybepleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more appropriately in the nature of a writ of Certiorarr,callingfortherecordsandquashingtheorderofthe3rdRespondent bearing orders No ZD361125og15o5Edl.2g'11.2025 as being illegal, arbitrary' and violative of the provrsions of the central Goods and services Tax Act, 2017, lhe lntegrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Goods and Services Tax (Compensation to States) Act, 2017 and Articles 14 and 265 of the Constitution of lndia, and consequently, direct the Respondents to issue refund of Cess to the Petitioner of Rs. 56,20,'1871- tor the tax period November 2021 made vide ARN 44361 0230447 54F on 31 -1 0-2023. l.A. NO: 2 OF 2026 Petition under Section '1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the impugned order of the 3rd Respondent bearing Order No. 2D3611250919262 d1.29 11 2025. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI KAILASH NATH P S S Counsel for the Respondents: SPECTAL GOVT PLEADER FOR STATE TAX W.P.No.13708 OF 2026 Between: Aurobindo Pharma Limited, Plot No.1 , Survey No.83/1 , Galaxy Tower, Floor Nos. 22- 24, Hyderabad Knowledge City Raidurg Panmaktha, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad - 500032, Telangana, lndia Rep by its Authorised Signatory, Mr. T. Deepak ...PETITIONER AND 1. State of Telangana, Revenue (Commercial Tax) Department Rep by its Secretary. 2. Deputy Commissioner (ST), STU-1, Punjagutta Division, Hyderabad. 3. Appellate Joint Commissioner of State Tax, Punjagutta Division, 5th Floor, C.T. Complex, Nampally, Hyderabad ,..RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction, more appropriately in the nature of a writ of certiorarr, calling for the records and quashing the order of the 3rd Respondent bearing order No. 2D3611250919s9r dt.29.11.2025 as being iilegal, arbitrary, and violative of the provisions of the central Goods and services Tax Act, 2017 , the lntegrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Goods and Servtces Tax (Compensation to States) Acl,2017 and Articles 14 and 265 of the Constitution of lndia, and consequently. direct the Respondents to issue refund of Cess to the Petitioner of Rs. '12,07,4201- for the tax period January 2023 made vide ARN. 4A3601 250003555 on 01 -01 -2025 l.A. NO: 2 OF 2026 Petition under Sectron 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed rn support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the impugned order of the 3rd Respondent bearing Order No. 2D3611250919597 dt29 112025 Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI KAILASH NATH P S S Counsel for the Respondents: SPECIAL GOVT PLEADER FOR STATE TAX W.P.No.13711 OF 2026 Between: Aurobindo Pharma Limrted, Plot No.1, Survey No.83/1 , Galaxy Tower, Floor Nos- 22-24, Hyderabad Knowledge City Raidurg Panmaktha, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad - 500032, Telangana, lndia Rep by its Authorised Signatory, Mr T Deepak ...PETITIONER AND 1. State of Telangana, Revenue (Commercial Tax) Department Rep by its Secretary. 2. Deputy Commissioner (ST), STU-1 Punjagutta Division, Hyderabad 3. Appellate Joint commissioner of state Tax, Punjagutta Division, Sth Floor, C T Complex, NamPallY, HYderabad ...RESPONDENTS Petrtion under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more appropriately in the nature of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records and quashing the order of the 3rd Respondent bearing Orcer No. 2D3611250918850 dt.29 11.2025 as being illegal, arbitrary, and violative of the provisions of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, lhe lntegrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Goods and Services Tax (Compensation to States) Acl, 2017 and Articles 14 and 265 of the Constitution of lndia, and consequently, direct the Respondents to issue refund of Cess to the Petitioner of Rs. 7,47,9961 for the tax period February 2021 made vide ARN- AA360 1 23086 1 82H on 31 -0'l -2023. l.A. NO: 2OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to suspend the impugned order of the 3rd Respondent bearing Order No. zD36 1 1 25091 8850 dt.29. 1 1 .2025. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI KAILASH NATH P S S Counsel for the Respondents: SPECIAL GOVT PLEADER FOR STATE TAX W.P.No.13715 OF 2026 Between: Aurobindo Pharma Limited., Plot No.1, Survey No.83/1, Galary Tower, Floor Nos. 22-24, Hyderabad Knowledge City Raidurg Panrnaktha, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad - 500032, Telangana, lndia Rep by its Authorised Signatory, Mr. T. Deepak ...PETITIONER AND '1. State of Telangana, Revenue (Commercial Tax) Department Rep by its Secretary. 2. Deputy Commissioner (ST), STU-1, Punjagutta DiviSion, Hyderabad. 3, Appellate Joint Commissioner of State Tax, Punjagutta Division, gtth Floor, C.T. Complex, Nampally, Hyderabad ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more appropriately in the nature of a writ of certiorari, calling for the records and quashing the order of the 3rd Respondent bearing Order No 2D361125091491F d1.29.11.2025 as being illegal, arbitrary, and violative of the provisions of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, the lntegrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2077 and the Goods and Services Tax (Compensation to States) Acl,2017 and Articles -14 and 265 of the Constitution of lndia, and consequently/ direct the Respondents to issue refund of Cess to the Petitioner of Rs. 8471 737 t- fot the tax period October 2020 made vide ARN AA3609220324021 on 29.09.2022. l.A. NO: 2 OF 2026 Petition under section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed rn support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the impugned order of the 3rd Respondent bearing Order No' 2D361125091491F dt 29 112025. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI KAILASH NATH P S S Counsel for the Respondents: SPECIAL GOVT PLEADER FOR STATE TAX W.P.No.13719 OF 2026 Between: Aurobindo Pharma Limited, Plot No.1 , Survey No.83/1 , Galaxy Tower, Floor Nos 22- 24, Hyderabad Knowledge City Raidurg Panmaktha, Serilingampally Mandal' Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad - 500032, Telangana, lndia Rep by its Authorised Signatory, Mr T Deepak ...PETITIONER AND 1. State of Telangana, Revenue Secretary (Commercial Tax) Department Rep by its 2 Deputy Commissioner (ST), STU-1 Punjagutta Division' Hyderabad' 3'AppellateJorntCommissionerofStateTax,PunjaguttaDivision,5thFloor, C T ComPlex, NamPallY, HYderabad ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Arlicle 226 of the Constitution of lndra praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more appropriatery in the nature of a writ of certiorari, ca,ing for the records and quashing the order of the 3rd Respondent bearing Order No. 2D361 12SOg1g3gV dt.2g. 1 1.2025 viorative of the provisions of the centrar Goods "".:i;,'::."f:r';lfl;l; ili lntegrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Goods and services Tax (compensation to states) Act, 2017 and Articres 14 and 2650f the constitution of lndia' and consequen,y, direct the Respondents to issue refund of cess to the Petitroner of Rs 28'58''1 73t- for the tax perod August 2022 made vide ARN AA360t 24042037 C on 3 1 _07 _2024, t.A. NO:2 oF2026 petition under section 1 51 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to suspend the impugned order of the 3rd ResjonOent bearing Order No. zD36 1 1 25og 1 g3gv dt.2g. 1 1 2025 Counsel for the petitioner: SRt KAILASH NATH p S S COUNSEI fOr thE RESPONdENTS: SPECIAL GOVT PLEADER FOR STATE TAX

The Court made the foilowing: COMMON ORDER

IN THE III(;H (]OT'RT FOR TIIE S-T'\T[' OF TELANGANA AT'IIYDIiR,TI}AT) THE HoNOI]R\BLE SIII JLISTICE P.SANI KOSHY AND THE tIO)iOI]R-\tiLE SRI JTISTICT] NARSING RAO N dNDIKoNT!A W.P.No s.l -1698 1-3699 13708 l37l I 13715 and l37l 9 oF 2026 28.04.2q1q lletween I ,\urobindo Ph'rrrna t lrlr itect Petitioner State of 1-e ianlran a- li.c'. cni:c C;;ii llct'ciiii I :' ' L-'";'''ii;i'etil Rep by its SL-c ici-i1r\ arl' i I lil'e r: ,\NI) i[t;rt h!,: \ri ./t',ti(t P SLln) Kosh))) Respondents C-OMM ()NO RDER Fleard \ir ' li'ai1':slr )iatl' P S 5' lc:rrnecl counsel for the petitionel atrd leartlecr Special [-ruvel i Ilr"]tli Pleacier 1bt State Iares l.rt r.:'1rt'" 1' 'i'' i' :rt'ttl 1111 'q"r" i 2. 'l-hesc aic tlic i'atcl-r ot r.i':it pgiit!'rrl-' which have been filed challenging 1lli' I i'i(rt-[iL)i'r oi tLre clrin.' i(-]'r illittnd o1'tax paid against on zero ratecl strppir. liri tliiti:rent neiio,.is'

2

3.

The relevant details in i'<:spect of which the petitioner filed individual writ petitions intiicating the tax period, tlie amount of refund claim, the date of Order-ln-Original and the date of Order- In-Appeal are furnished in the iblrn of tabulation charl hereinunder: WP Taxperiod Anrountof refirnd (in Rs.) Date of Orderin Date of Orderin I,] Ori inal A al 0l 17.06.2025 WP I 3698/202 i, wPt3699120)6 ir;r:l0l-l 5 6..1.5.8 I sa:o.i87 09.05.2024 WP 13708/202(r .lr:nuar)'202.j t] .01.2025 wPl371li20:(j Irebluan' li;l I 09.0s ,2024 WP I 3 7l 5i 202o )ciober'2020 i 8 +,7 t.737 I :s.ia.rn 09.05.2024 \NP1371912026 l,\ugust2()22 16.05.202s

4.

Recently, the Division Rench of this l-ligh CoLrrt headed by the Hon'ble 'Ihe Chiel'Justicc hacl taken up an identical matter in respect of the very snllrr. lr!.titionci i,e., Aurobindo pharma Limited v. State of Telanganar. u.'hercin the Division Bench has in paragraph Nos.9 to I I hai heiC its uncier

9.

The matters har e Lr,:i:rt taken up toda!. However- at tlie outset. learned cc',ul:..r1 l'cr ihc r.usp,-rndent State, on instructions. suhntits tfr,rr rir., pr:.:itioti ir.r l:iiv has been clarified by the Division I3enr ir jl,d::nrcnl of Cilri.lr'ai Iligh Court in the Nl;..etntrer lri'l S.No. 24 25 26 27 28 29 29.11.2025 29.11.202s 29.11,.2025 29.1t.2025 29.t1.202s 29.t 1.2025 ' 2025 181 taxmann.com 701 ( tpr;. : .'. ., li

I') cirsc oi tlul [_imitetl antl anothcr L L nion ol. lndia and others' lhe (irL;arat i{:h L.ttu!.t itr ihc case of refund of Ltnutili,'cd IJL :is agitirrst Zelo l.ittltil :,Lrppl.. of Compensation qq', p.rid. h(' l.l rjr.r. lt(. pclitjoll..r rrr rrr(11 s25s5 can clarm letund oi ritc tj.,s pard on pi;r.ihr - r-t coal used ior rnanrti.i.:rrLLrli] ol' rootl,s c\portc!l bcilq zel.o-rated supplies. 'l-he pcririoner nia\ hare paid the IGS'l r,n thc goocls exported by ir- bLrt it rras rrcrt re(iu;t!.d to pa1 arrj aon.lpensation cess as thc grrorls nttnlrrirctr-lled hr the pct Lr.,jtc1 i.i.J L,xempted fronl the lcr v ,rl tln. In sLnir ir scc;rar io. ti:t Ia.-,, laicl dora n in the case of Patson l,apcrr l,rir atc Lim jtri! r. I nion of India and othersi ,,roulcl 5,1p;.1rgi1 appll to ii)r iircts ct the present case. .['he i:ase ol Pntson Papcr.s priratc t_inritcd lsupra) re]ated to the ntaltlatiLti.c ot ilr,:s tirrtj thet.e u,ls pulchltse olcoai in the manrrl:rct irinr 0r,:cts-. I! u.r; ir,r.ri.,rLi in prodtrction of finisherl qoods r,, i.rich *as nor liablc ro CST. Finished goods uerc erporlcil Lreirrq ztrrr-rateci suprpiy. l1 rs sr.rbmitted that in the light L'i 1lri'r.aii.t i,.irdered [_.r, 1i:r ir,i;ai.at High Court, rhc dep:l.rr.r , i. ;l , lt:r.,,1 'r,Tr.t,,rsiit,.,T i;rJ ntatri:. 10. l.,rrlneci ct,irnrci tirr the peiilicrr:i :;LLbnrits thar in the preseni ca:r. posrltrrrr irr leu,rvoLLld r.,:ruin the same as the coal is usetl lrs:n iitpr,i iur.n:anulacturill l)ul-itoses underttkelt by the petit!onei tlr.. lilai pr.oiiui:t cri ,,.,i;icir rs erported. These exporrs ure tcr iltc St:z and arr'c:<t:ritplrui lionr levy ol.tax. If that be the c.,s.- ilrc st:rncl ol'tltfi re5il()ndent depat.tntent to re.ject tlte retr-tnrl ,r' r_tcclrli)lllatc(l u11trtilized cess but not requirccl irr lre Lrscr-! lirr. lnakir.rg ,ter.o-;:rir:d sLrpplies rvlrich are non-ia\.rhlC srrpplic. lt; !, llol L.j.lrpai t.carncJ coLursel lor the petitioner llrrher :,rLbrniLs tlrat ritc -irulgntcnt in case of patson Papers Prit tle Limited (supra) \\as calrieC to the Hon,ble Supt-crtre { o r11 hr thr R.\'erue ar1.l thc Spccial Leave petition qas disrn isse .1. ll. \,Ve itrr e lrertr.d tltu lcarneil couuscl lbi. Lhe parties atrd taken rrcrte of thl. r'laiIrinl ilcls aj)d tlis rL-,i(,,,irnr provisiorrs of the 2025 (7) TMi 1768 ' 2ozs 161 ll,,tr t:a I

4 5 Cess Act. CGST Aci rrrii l( tr,e,.una., 1vir,.,,,,,,1,i., i,i,1 ;:':,ill.,[,XXl;]lHi::: has been well laicl clou,n iir tl Limited (suprai ;;; ;il.Iil:J,tHirT:J,1,: departnlcut is inclinL:Ll to r.cc the decisions."in,.",i',,r",,r__i.ttsJer rhc ;nattEr i, the Iight of original and ;"-;;-,"": rab,'e thi irnprrgncd order-In- remanded to the ong;n-il .,,,,,:1:;."..-' set aside rhe matter is accordance *i,r', Irr, "ti.. nority to take a fresh decision in petitioner *i,r,;,,, i", :,,i',,; r":,:,,;; i:li;:;;,.or hearing to rhe Today, when the ura er- i:; taken up fl-rr hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner as also rhe iearrred counsel for the respondents do not dispute tlie fac:t that the issue involved in these writ petitions is identical r,,hir:h is a"lroadr,. iiisposed of in lespect of the ver-y same petitioner iri ii iratch o.l.u,1;1 pg1i1l6pa.

6.

Given the said tao il:21 11,* Division Bench of this Court in identical set of facts in .t-speci of the i,ery sarne assessee have allowed the writ petitiorrs aiirj hav.e r.enrancled the rnattcr back to the oliginal authority to takc a iiesh decision. in accordance with law. after giving an opportunit-r,, oi. hearing to the petitioner as has been directed in the othe. barclL 'i'ir.it petitionii. I-et the present batch of matters also be deciclecl ,,r irh jir a perioci of ibur. (04) nronths in accordance with law,. atit,r gir ing ar oopor.tLrnity of.hearing to the petitioner.

) 7 Accoiclinelv. thesc rvrir. petirioris ai.e aIowed with the above dilection. No orrlel.iisr r-() c()sts closed BS 9r"a l\l isce I Ianco l-r s alplications pt,ncling. if any, shall stand AHMED ABDULLA KHAN STANT REGISTRAR ASS //// To, SECTION OFFICER 1 The Secreta ry, State of Tr su",..1;;, r,i:,,"ir1lr"i,r?l"sa na' Revenue (commerciat rax) Department Deputy commrssioner (sr), STU-1, punjagutta Division, Hyderabad lPf"li* Jojnt .Commissioner of State Tax puniaou c l complex Nampailf iyoerabad - tta Division. 5th Floor, One CC to SRt KATLASH N I5:[ *H.,,,ilfl f#,,st+:,?": 3:t: T:,;;i ::,. f. r,he s,a,e .f Two CD Copies. 2 a 4. 5 t) BSK

HIGH COURT DATED: 2BtO4l2O26 COMMON ORDER ALLOWING THE WRIT PETITIONS WITHOUT COSTS WP.No. 13698, 13699, 1320g,13t11, 13715 & 13719 0F 2026 .''K hB IH€ S t-) @ 1E JUN 1|]?6 PATr:u ID t' z r) * {,' * @o^o ftlsl'+'

Reproduced from the public record of the Telangana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.