M/S Lux Industries Limited vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.

WPA/3370/2021HC CalcuttaGSTCNR WBCHCA005740202130 November 2021Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE MD. NIZAMUDDIN2 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

Held

The Court held that the issue concerning the vires of Rule 89(5) of the CGST/WBGST Rules had been finally settled by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Union of India & Ors. Vs. VKC Footsteps India Pvt. Ltd. (2021 SCC Online SC 706). In that judgment, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of the aforesaid provisions. Consequently, the High Court found no merit in the present writ petition, as the core issue raised by the petitioner had already been decided against them by the apex court. The Court dismissed the writ petition based on this precedent.

Facts

The petitioner, M/s. Lux Industries Limited, filed a writ petition challenging the vires of Rule 89(5) of the CGST/WBGST Rules. The petitioner sought a declaration that this rule was ultra vires and beyond the scope of Section 54(3) of the CGST Act and WBGST Act. The writ petition was filed before the High Court. The respondents were the Union of India and other CGST and State authorities.

Key Issues

1. Whether Rule 89(5) of the CGST/WBGST Rules is ultra vires and de hors Section 54(3) of the CGST Act and WBGST Act? The petitioner argued that Rule 89(5) was beyond the legislative competence of the rule-making authority and inconsistent with the parent Act. The revenue, represented by the Union of India and CGST/State authorities, contended that the rule was valid and constitutionally sound. The court noted that this issue had been finally settled by the Supreme Court.

Sections Cited

Rule 89(5), Section 54(3)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

S/L 124 30.11.2021 Court. No. 2 cm WPA 3370 of 2021 M/s. Lux Industries Limited Vs. Union of India & Ors. (Through Video Conference) Mr. Dipankar Majumdar …. For the Petitioner Mr. Y.J. Dastoor Ld. ASG Mr. Vipul Kundalia Mr. Debashis Saha Mr. S. Majumder Mr. Anurag Roy …. For the UOI Mr. Vipul Kundalia Ms. Ekta Sinha … for the CGST authority Mr. A. Ray, Ld. GP Mr. S. Mukherjee Mr. D. Ghosh …. For the State Heard both the parties. The scope of this writ petition is very limited to challenging the vires of Rule 89(5)of CGST/WBGST Rules by asking for declaration of the same as ultra vires and de-hors Section 54(3) of CGST Act and WBGST Act which issue has now been finally settled by the Hon’ble Supreme Court by judgment dated 13th September, 2021 in the case of Union of India & Ors. Vs. VKC Footsteps India Pvt. Ltd. reported in 2021 SCC Online SC 706 where the Hon’ble Supreme Court has upheld the Constitutional validity of the aforesaid provisions.

2 Taking into consideration the aforesaid judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court I find no merit in this writ petition. This writ petition being WPA No. 3370 of 2021 is accordingly d

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Calcutta High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.