Chandi Steel Industries LTD. vs. Superintendent, Central Tax, Range-Iii, Bally-I Division Howrah CGST And Cx Commissionerate And Ors
Held
The Court considered the submissions of both parties. The Court directed the respondent no.2, the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs, to consider and dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 3rd February, 2022. This disposal must be in accordance with the law and by passing a reasoned and speaking order. The order is to be passed within four weeks from the date of communication of the High Court's order. The Court did not delve into the merits of the SVLDRS payment dispute itself but focused on the procedural aspect of the authority's inaction.
Facts
The petitioner, Chandi Steel Industries Ltd., filed a writ petition before the High Court of Calcutta, being W.P.A. 3578 of 2022. The petitioner was aggrieved by the inaction of the respondent authorities in disposing of its representation dated 3rd February, 2022. This representation pertained to payment in respect of the Sabka Vishwas Legacy Dispute Resolution Scheme (SVLDRS). The petitioner sought a direction for the disposal of this representation.
Key Issues
1. Whether the respondent authorities have failed to act upon the representation filed by the petitioner dated 3rd February, 2022, concerning payments under the SVLDRS, thereby causing prejudice to the petitioner? The petitioner argued that the respondent authorities have been inactive in disposing of its representation, which relates to payments under the SVLDRS. The petitioner sought a direction for the timely and proper disposal of this representation. The respondents' arguments are not recorded in the judgment.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
2022. p.b. Sl. No.
W.P.A. 3578 of 2022 (Through Video Conference) Chandi Steel Industries Ltd. Vs. Superintendent, Central Tax, Range-III, Bally-I Division, Howrah CGST & CX commissionerate & Ors. Mr. Agnibesh Sengupta, Mr. Indranil Banerjee, Mr. Subrata Mukherjee. ………for the petitioner. Mr. Somnath Ganguli, Mr. Sukalpa Seal. ……….for the respondent no.
Mr. Falguni Bandopadhyay. ……….for the respondent no.
The affidavit of service filed by the petitioner be kept with the record. Heard learned advocates appearing for the parties. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner being aggrieved by inaction on the part of the respondent authority concerned in disposing its representation dated 3rd February, 2022 as appears at page 61 of the writ petition and sitting over the same, relating to payment in respect of SVLDRS and the details of the case of the petitioner will appear from the said representation. Considering the submission of the parties, this writ petition being WPA No.3578 of 2022 is disposed of by 2 directing the respondent no.2/Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs to consider and dispose of the aforesaid representation dated 3r
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Calcutta High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.