M/S. Cmg Ductiles Limited And Anr. vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Revenue And Ors.
Facts
The petitioners, M/s. CMG Ductiles Ltd. & Anr., filed a writ petition before the High Court seeking a direction to the respondent authorities to consider and dispose of their representation dated December 6, 2022. This representation was made against the alleged blocking of the petitioners' Electronic Credit Ledger under Rule 86A of the CGST/WBGST Rules, 2017. The petitioners are seeking a resolution regarding the status of their credit ledger, which has been blocked by the Assistant Commissioner of Revenue, Bureau of Investigation, South Bengal, and other respondents.
Held
The Court considered the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions of the parties. It held that the writ petition should be disposed of by directing the respondent Authority concerned to consider and dispose of the petitioners' representation dated December 6, 2022. The disposal must be in accordance with the law, involving a reasoned and speaking order. Crucially, the Court mandated that an opportunity of hearing be provided to the petitioners or their authorized representative before a final decision is made. This directive is to be completed within a period of two weeks from the date of communication of the order.
Key Issues
1. Whether the respondent authority should be directed to consider and dispose of the petitioners' representation dated December 6, 2022, concerning the blocking of their Electronic Credit Ledger under Rule 86A of the CGST/WBGST Rules, 2017? The petitioners argued that their representation needs to be addressed by the concerned authority. The revenue or State did not record any specific argument against this prayer, but their presence indicates their role in the matter.
Sections Cited
Rule 86A
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
2023 ks WPA 28485 of 2022 sl. 23 M/s. CMG Ductiles Ltd. & Anr.
Vs Assistant Commissioner of Revenue, Bureau of Investigation, South Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Ankit Kanodia, Ms. Megha Agarwal, Mr. Jitesh Sah … For the Petitioners.
Mr. A. Ray, Ld. GP., Mr. T.M. Siddiqui, Mr. N. Chatterjee, Mr. V. Kothari … For the State.
Heard learned Advocates appearing for the parties.
By this writ petition, petitioners have made an innocuous prayer of direction upon the respondent authority concerned to consider and dispose of its representation dated 6th December, 2022 as annexed to the writ petition against the alleged blocking of Electronic Credit Ledger of the petitioners under Rule 86A of the CGST/WBGST Rules, 2017. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submission of the parties, this writ petition being WPA 28485 of 2022 is disposed of by directing the respondent Authority concerned to consider and dispose of the aforesaid representation in accordance with law and by passing a r
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Calcutta High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.