Somnath Ray vs. Aditional Commissioner Of Central Tax, CGST And C.Ex. Commissionerate, Howrah And Ors.
Facts
The petitioner, Somnath Ray, filed a writ petition before the Calcutta High Court seeking to file a statutory appeal against an adjudication order. The petitioner requested the Court to dispense with the pre-deposit requirement for filing the appeal. The adjudication order was passed by the Additional Commissioner of Central Tax, CGST & C.EX. Commissionerate, Howrah. The petitioner relied on an unreported decision of the Delhi High Court in the case of Shubh Impex – Vs – Union of India & Ors. dated April 27, 2018, to support his contention.
Held
The Court held that the petitioner has no merit for granting an order of exemption from making the pre-deposit. The Court also found that the unreported decision of the Delhi High Court in Shubh Impex, relied upon by the petitioner, is not applicable to the facts and circumstances of the present case. Accordingly, the writ petition was dismissed. No specific provision of law was discussed in detail, nor was the amount in dispute or the tax period mentioned.
Key Issues
1. Whether the petitioner is entitled to an exemption from the pre-deposit requirement for filing a statutory appeal against the adjudication order, considering the facts and circumstances of the case? 2. Whether the decision of the Delhi High Court in Shubh Impex – Vs – Union of India & Ors. is applicable to the present case? The petitioner argued that he should be allowed to file his statutory appeal by dispensing with the pre-deposit formality. He relied on the Delhi High Court's unreported decision in Shubh Impex. The CGST authority and Union of India were represented, but their specific arguments are not recorded in the judgment.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
WPA 8783 OF 2023 18.05.2023
Sl no. 26
Somnath Ray Ct no. 2
- Vs - P.M.
Additional Commissioner of Central Tax,
CGST & C.EX. Commissionerate, Howrah & Ors.
Mr. Sumit Ghosh
… for the petitioner
Mr. Kaushik Dey,
Mr. Tapan Bhanja
… for the CGST authority.
Ms. Rama Chakraborty
… for Union of India
Heard learned advocates appearing for the parties.
By this writ petition, petitioner has made prayer for relief, inter alia for allowing the petitioner to file statutory appeal by dispensing with the formality of making pre-deposit against the adjudication order in question.
In support of his contention the petitioner has relied on an unreported decision of the Hon’ble Delhi High Court dated 27th April, 2018 in the case of Shubh Impex – Vs – Union of India & Ors. (Writ petition (Civil) No. 138/2018 and CM No. 593/2018).
Considering the submission of the parties and facts on perusal of the recordings in the impugned order, I find that petitioner has got no merit for granting order of exemption from making pre-deposit.
2 I also find that
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Calcutta High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.