M/S Consortium Of Eta Engineers Private Limited And Polycab Wires PVT. LTD. vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.
Facts
The petitioner, M/s. Consortium of ETA Engineers Private Limited & Polycab Wires Private Limited, challenged an order dated 21st February, 2023, passed by the Appellate Authority under the CGST Act. The Appellate Authority dismissed the petitioner's appeal on a technical ground: a delay of five days in filing the certified copy of an order manually. The petitioner contended that the appeal itself was filed within the prescribed time limit. The writ petition was filed before the High Court seeking to set aside this dismissal order.
Held
The Court held that dismissing the petitioner's appeal on a mere technical ground of a very minor delay of five days in filing the certified copy, without considering the merits of the appeal, was not in the interest of justice. The Court reasoned that such a dismissal, based solely on a procedural technicality, would prevent the petitioner from having their substantive appeal heard. Consequently, the impugned order of the Appellate Authority dated 21st February, 2023, was set aside. The matter was remanded back to the Appellate Authority to hear and dispose of the appeal on its merits, after providing an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The petitioner was granted liberty to raise all points argued in the writ petition before the Appellate Authority.
Key Issues
1. Whether the Appellate Authority was justified in dismissing the petitioner's appeal on the technical ground of a five-day delay in filing the certified copy of an order, despite the appeal being filed within the time limit? Petitioner's Argument: The petitioner argued that the appeal was filed within the statutory time frame and that the dismissal on a minor technicality of five days' delay in filing the certified copy was unjust, especially when the merits of the appeal were not considered. Revenue's Argument: The judgment does not record any specific arguments made by the CGST Authority or the Union of India.
Sections Cited
CGST Act
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
2023 ks WPA 18509 of 2023 sl. 19 M/s. Consortium of ETA Engineers Private Limited & Polycab Wires Private Limited.
Vs Union of India & Ors.
Ms. Mridusha Guha … For the Petitioner.
Mr. K.K. Maiti, Ms. Ekta Sinha … For the CGST Authority.
Mr. Tilak Mitra, Mr. Prithu Dudhoria … For the UOI.
Heard learned Advocates appearing for the parties.
By this writ petition, petitioner has challenged the impugned order of the Appellate Authority dated 21st February, 2023, passed by the Appellate Authority under the CGST Act dismissing the appeal of the petitioner on the technical ground of delay of five days in filing the certified copy of the order manually though it appears from record that the appeal was filed within time.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and that the appeal in question of the petitioner was dismissed on a mere technical ground of a very minor delay of five days in filing the appeal without going into the merits of the appeal, in the interest of justice th
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Calcutta High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.