Console Management Consultants Private Limited vs. The Commissioner Of Central Tax, Kolkata South Commissionerate And Ors

WPA/8576/2024HC CalcuttaGSTCNR WBCHCA015725202409 April 2024Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE MD. NIZAMUDDIN2 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Facts

The petitioner, Console Management Consultants Private Limited, filed a writ petition before the Calcutta High Court, Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction, Appellate Side, being WPA 8576 of 2024. The petitioner was aggrieved by an adjudication order dated January 16, 2024, passed under the Finance Act, 1994. The respondent authorities were the Commissioner of Central Tax, Kolkata South Commissionerate, and Ors. The petitioner approached the High Court directly via a writ petition instead of availing the statutory appeal remedy available against the adjudication order.

Held

The Court held that the petitioner had rushed to the writ court instead of availing the statutory appeal remedy available against the adjudication order dated January 16, 2024, passed under the Finance Act, 1994. The Court was not inclined to grant any relief to the writ petitioner on merits. However, considering the facts and circumstances, the Court extended the time for the petitioner to file the statutory appeal within four weeks from the date of the order, subject to the petitioner complying with all the formalities for filing the appeal. The Court did not decide on the merits of the adjudication order itself.

Key Issues

1. Whether the petitioner, aggrieved by an adjudication order passed under the Finance Act, 1994, which is an appealable order, is entitled to maintain a writ petition before the High Court instead of availing the statutory remedy of appeal? The petitioner argued that they had approached the writ court. The CGST Authorities argued that the adjudication order dated January 16, 2024, was an appealable order under the statute, and therefore, the petitioner ought to have availed the alternative remedy of filing a statutory appeal rather than rushing to the writ court. No other arguments or reliance on specific provisions, circulars, or precedents were recorded for either side.

Sections Cited

Finance Act, 1994

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

30 09.04.2024 Ct. No.02 pg/RUP. Kolkata South Commissionerate & Ors. Ms. Anupa Banerjee Ms. Arijita Ghosh … For the petitioner Mr. K.K. Maiti Ms. Ekta Sinha … For the CGST Authorities Heard learned advocates appearing for the parties. The petitioner has filed this writ petition being aggrieved by the adjudication order dated 16th January, 2024 passed under the relevant provisions of Finance Act, 1994 which is an appealable order under the statute and the petitioner instead of availing such alternative remedy has rushed to this writ Court. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submission of the parties, I am not inclined to grant any relief to the writ petitioner except extending the time to file statutory appeal within four weeks from date, subject to compliance of all formalities of filing the appeal.

2 With this observation and direction, this writ petition, being WPA 8576 of 2024, is disposed of. Urgent photostat certified copy of t

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Calcutta High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.