Subhankar Golder vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax Serampore Charge And Ors

MAT/639/2024HC CalcuttaGSTCNR WBCHCA017432202409 April 2024Bench: THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE T.S SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA3 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

Facts

The appellant, Subhankar Golder, a small retailer of imitation jewellery, challenged the cancellation of his GST registration. The registration was cancelled for failing to furnish returns for six consecutive months. His appeal before the statutory appellate authority was dismissed on 04.01.2024 as it was filed beyond the condonable period. The appellant then filed a writ petition, and an intra-Court appeal against the Single Judge's order declining interim relief and directing the filing of an affidavit-in-opposition. The High Court, with consent, disposed of both the appeal and the writ petition.

Held

The Court held that the appellant should be provided with one more opportunity to remedy the default. Reasoning that the appellant is an individual and a small retailer, the Court deemed it appropriate to permit him to rectify the breach. Accordingly, the order of cancellation of registration was set aside. This relief is conditional upon the appellant filing returns for the entire period of default, paying the requisite tax, interest, fine, and penalty within three weeks of receiving a server copy of the order. If compliance occurs, the registration will be restored by the Jurisdictional Officer. Failure to comply will result in the automatic dismissal of the writ petition. The respondents are directed to open the portal to facilitate the filing of returns and remittance of dues. The issue of whether the initial dismissal of the appeal by the appellate authority was justified was implicitly set aside by granting this opportunity.

Key Issues

1. Whether the appellant should be granted an opportunity to remedy the default in filing GST returns, considering his status as a small retailer. The appellant argued that he should be given one more opportunity to rectify the situation, emphasizing his status as an individual and a small retailer. The revenue or State did not record any specific arguments against this in the judgment.

Sections Cited

CGST & WBGST Act, 2017

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

15 & ors. Mr. Akshat Agarwal … For the Appellant

Mr. T. M. Siddiqui, ld. A.G.P. Mr. Tanmoy Chakraborty Mr. Saptak Sanyal … For the State

1.

This intra-Court appeal filed by the writ petitioner is directed against the order passed by the learned Single Judge declining to grant any interim order in the writ petition while directing the respondents to file the affidavit-in-opposition. With the consent of the learned counsel for the respective parties, the appeal and the writ petition are disposed of by this common order.

2.

The appellant had challenged t

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Calcutta High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.