Shankar Chouhan vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.
Facts
The petitioner, Shankar Chouhan, filed a writ petition challenging an order cancelling his GST registration. The cancellation was based on the ground of non-filing of returns within the stipulated time. The State of West Bengal and CGST authorities were respondents. The matter was heard by the High Court.
Held
The Court disposed of the writ petition by directing the respondent authority to intimate the petitioner within seven working days regarding any revenue due for the restoration of registration. The petitioner is required to make the payment within ten days of receiving this intimation. The respondent authority shall open the portal for thirty days from the date of the order to facilitate this payment. If the petitioner makes the payment within the stipulated time, the registration will be restored. If no revenue is due, the registration shall be restored immediately. Failure to pay within the stipulated time will allow the respondent authority to close the portal again and proceed according to law. The Court did not expressly leave any issue undecided.
Key Issues
1. Whether the cancellation of the petitioner's GST registration on the ground of non-filing of returns within the stipulated time is valid, and if not, what relief can be granted? Petitioner's contention: The petitioner sought restoration of his GST registration. The specific arguments made by the petitioner are not detailed in the judgment, but the relief sought implies a challenge to the cancellation order. Revenue/State's contention: The State and CGST authorities were represented, but their specific arguments or contentions are not recorded in the judgment. The judgment indicates that the parties were heard.
Sections Cited
Not specified in the judgment
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
WPA 9579 OF 2024 09.04.2024
Sl no. 14
Shankar Chouhan. Ct no. 2
- Vs - P.M.
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Himangshu Kumar Ray,
Mr. Subhasis Poddar
Ms. Shiwani Shaw
… for the petitioner
Md. T. M. Siddiqui, Mr. Tanoy Chakraborty Mr. Debraj Sahu
... for the State.
Mr. K. K. Maiti,
Mr. Tapan Bhanja
.. for CGST authorities.
Heard learned advocates appearing for the parties.
The subject matter of challenge in this writ petition arises out of order of cancellation of petitioner’s registration on the ground of non-filing of return within the stipulated time.
Considering the facts and circumstances of this case and submission of the parties and in the interest of justice, this writ petition being WPA 9579 of 2024 is disposed of by directing the respondent authority concerned to intimate the petitioner within seven working days with regard to the revenue due, if any, which is required to be paid by the petitioner for restoration of its registration and petitioner shall make such payment within ten days from the date of
2 rece
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Calcutta High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.