Punjab National Bank And Anr. vs. Commissioner Of CGST And Cx, Kolkata South Commissionerate And Anr.
Original PDF →Facts
The petitioners, Punjab National Bank & Anr., filed a writ petition before the High Court challenging an order passed by the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata. The learned Advocate for the petitioners submitted that the writ petition had been wrongly filed before the High Court as it pertained to the determination of a Division Bench. The revenue authority, The Commissioner of CGST & CX, Kolkata South Commissionerate & Anr., was the respondent.
Held
The Court noted the submission made by the learned Advocate for the petitioner that the writ petition had been wrongly filed before the High Court as it pertained to the determination of a Division Bench. Based on this submission, the Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn. Liberty was granted to the petitioner to file afresh, implying that the petitioner could re-file the petition in the correct forum or with the correct procedure. The Court did not delve into the merits of the challenge to the CESTAT order.
Key Issues
1. Whether the writ petition filed before the High Court is the appropriate forum for challenging an order passed by the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata, particularly when it pertains to the determination of a Division Bench? Petitioner's Contention: The learned Advocate for the petitioner argued that the writ petition was wrongly filed before the High Court, implying that a different forum or procedure was required for the challenge. Revenue's Contention: The judgment does not record any specific arguments from the CGST Authority.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
2024 Sl. No. 122. M/L. Mithun Ct.No.5
WPA 16130 of 2024
Punjab National Bank & Anr. Vs. The Commissioner of CGST & CX, Kolkata South Commissionerate & Anr.
Mr. Tarun Chatterjee, Mr. Pratip Mukherjee, Mr. Soumya Sankar Chini
..for the petitioners. Mr. Uday Shankar Bhattacharyya, Mr. Tapan Bhanja …for the CGST Authority.
The present writ petition has been filed, inter alia, challenging the order passed by the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata.
Mr. Tarun Chatterjee, learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the writ petition has been wrongly filed before this Court as the same pertains to the determination of the Hon’ble Division Bench.
Having regard to the aforesaid, let the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Liberty to file afresh.
(Raja Basu Chowdhury, J.)
Reproduced from the public record of the Calcutta High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.