M/S Haldia Nirman Projects Private Limited And Anr vs. The Superintendent, Range-1, CGST And Cx, Haldia-I Division And Ors
Held
The Court held that since the petitioner had placed before it an order dated September 13, 2024, demonstrating that the entire proceedings initiated by the show cause notice dated May 29, 2024, for the tax period 2019-20, had been dropped, nothing further survived in the present writ petition. Consequently, the Court found no necessity to adjudicate on the merits of the case. The ratio decidendi is that a writ petition becomes infructuous and is liable to be disposed of when the action under challenge is withdrawn or dropped by the issuing authority. The operative direction was to dispose of the writ petition.
Facts
The petitioners, M/s Haldia Nirman Projects Private Limited & Anr., filed a writ petition before the Calcutta High Court. The petition challenged proceedings initiated by the Superintendent, Range-1, CGST & CX. The proceedings were based on a show cause notice dated May 29, 2024, concerning the tax period 2019-20. The petitioners presented an order dated September 13, 2024, to the Court, indicating that the entire proceedings had been dropped by the revenue authorities.
Key Issues
1. Whether the writ petition is maintainable when the proceedings initiated by the revenue authorities have been dropped. The petitioner argued that since the show cause notice proceedings for the tax period 2019-20 have been dropped by an order dated September 13, 2024, nothing further survives for adjudication in the present writ petition. The revenue authorities did not present any counter-argument regarding the maintainability of the petition in light of the dropped proceedings.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
DL 1 18.09.2024 Saswata Ct 5
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE
WPA 16057 of 2024 M/s Haldia Nirman Projects Private Limited & Anr. Versus The Supreintendent, Range-1, CGST & CX and Ors. Mr. Ankit Kanodia Mr. Megha Agarwal Mr. Piyush Khaitan … For the petitioners. Mr. Bhaskar Prosad Banerjee Mr. Tapan Bhanja … For the CGST & CX authorities. Mr. Debashis Chowdhury Mr. Prithu Dudhoria …For the Union of India Mr. A. Ray, Ld. GP Mr. Md. T.M.Siddiqui, Ld. AGP Mr. T. Chakraborty Mr. S. Sanyal …For the State
Since, Mr. Kanodia learned advocate appearing for the petitioners by placing before this Court an order dated 13th September 2024 submits that the entire proceedings initiated vide show cause notice dated 29th May 2024 for the tax period 2019-20 has since been dropped, I am of the view that nothing survives in the present writ petition. Let a copy of the aforesaid order dated 13th September 2024 is retained with the record.
In view thereof, the writ petition being WPA 16057 of 2024 is accordingly disposed of.
All parties shall act on the basis of the server copy of this o
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Calcutta High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.