M/S. Techno Waxchem Private Limited vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.
Original PDF →Facts
The petitioner, M/s. Techno Waxchem Private Limited, filed a writ petition before the Calcutta High Court. The respondent authorities were the Union of India, CGST & CX, and the State. The petitioner's counsel submitted that there were formal defects in the writ petition and sought leave to withdraw it with liberty to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action. The counsel for the CGST & CX authorities and the State did not oppose this prayer.
Held
The Court allowed the petitioner's prayer to withdraw the writ petition. The Court noted that the petitioner sought to withdraw the petition due to formal defects and requested liberty to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action. The respondent authorities, representing CGST & CX and the State, did not oppose this request. Consequently, the Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn, granting the petitioner the liberty to file a fresh petition on the selfsame cause of action. The specific nature of the formal defects or the underlying GST dispute was not elaborated upon, as the decision was based on the procedural request for withdrawal.
Key Issues
1. Whether the petitioner should be granted leave to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file afresh on the selfsame cause of action, considering the submission of formal defects in the original petition? Petitioner's Argument: The petitioner argued that due to formal defects in the writ petition, it should be allowed to withdraw the current petition and file a fresh one on the same cause of action. No specific provisions of law or precedents were cited in support of this argument. Revenue/State's Argument: The respondent authorities, CGST & CX and the State, did not oppose the petitioner's prayer for withdrawal with liberty to file afresh. They did not present any arguments against the petitioner's request.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
9 11.06.2025 sb Ct 5
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURI ICTION APPELLATE SIDE
WPA 10836 of 2025
M/s. Techno Waxchem Private Limited Versus Union of India & Ors.
Mr. Vinay Kumar Shraff
Mr. Dev Kumar Agarwal
Ms.Swarnwarshi Poddar
… For the petitioner.
Mr. Bhaskar Prosad Banerjee
Mr. Tapan Bhanja
.. For the respondent CGST & CX
Mr. Anirban Ray
Md. T. M. Siddiqui
Mr. Nilotpal Chatterjee
Mr. Tanoy Chakraborty
Mr. Saptak Sanyal
… For the State.
Mr. Shraff, learned advocate representing the petitioner would submit that there are formal defects in the writ petition, as such, he seeks leave to withdraw the same with liberty to file afresh on the selfsame cause of action.
Mr. Banerjee, learned advocate representing the CGST & CX authorities and Mr. Sanyal, learned advocate representing the State do not oppose such prayer.
Having regard thereto, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh on the selfsame cause of action.
(Raja Basu Chowdhury, J.)
2
Reproduced from the public record of the Calcutta High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.