Md Sabirul Islam vs. The State Of West Bengal And Ors.

Original PDF →
WPA/14499/2024HC CalcuttaGSTCNR WBCHCA026931202406 August 2025Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJA BASU CHOWDHURY1 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

Facts

The petitioner, Md. Sabirul Islam, filed a writ petition (WPA 14499 of 2024) before the High Court at Calcutta. The petition was directed against the State of West Bengal and other respondents. The petitioner, through a communication dated 5th March 2025, expressed an intention to withdraw the writ petition. This withdrawal was sought to avail the benefits of an amnesty scheme provided under Section 128 of the CGST/WBGST Act, 2017. The communication was placed before the Court for consideration.

Held

The Court held that the petitioner intended to withdraw the instant writ petition to avail the benefit of the amnesty scheme as provided under Section 128 of the CGST/WBGST Act, 2017. Based on this submission and intention expressed by the petitioner, the Court decided to dismiss the writ petition as withdrawn. The Court retained a copy of the communication dated 5th March 2025 with the record. The operative direction was to dismiss the writ petition as withdrawn.

Key Issues

1. Whether the petitioner is entitled to withdraw the writ petition to avail the benefit of the amnesty scheme under Section 128 of the CGST/WBGST Act, 2017? The petitioner argued that they intended to withdraw the writ petition to take advantage of the amnesty scheme. The State's contention, as implied by the Court's order, was to permit the withdrawal based on the petitioner's stated intention. No specific arguments from the State regarding the merits of the amnesty scheme or the petition itself were recorded.

Sections Cited

Section 128

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

06.08.

2025 Item No. AD 1 Saswata

WPA 14499 of 2024

Md. Sabirul Islam Vs State of West Bengal & Ors.

Ms. Sweta Mukherjee Ms. Tanima Nandy …For the petitioner Mr. Amitabrata Roy, Ld. GP Mr. Tanoy Chakraborty Ms. Sumita Shaw Mr. Saptak Sanyal …For the State

1.

Since the petitioner by placing before this Court a communication dated 5th March 2025 would submit that the petitioner intends to withdraw the instant writ petition to avail the benefit of amnesty Scheme as provided under Section 128 of the CGST /WBGST Act, 2017, let the writ petition be dismissed as withdrawn.

2.

A copy of the communication dated 5th March 2025 is retained with the record.

(Raja Basu Chowdhury, J.)

Reproduced from the public record of the Calcutta High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.