Calcutta Club LTD vs. Principal Commissioner Of CGST Adn Cx,Kol And Ors
Held
The Court noted the submission made by the learned Advocate for the petitioner that the petitioner was not willing to pursue the writ petition further and sought its withdrawal. The Court also took on record the printout of the e-mail dated September 18, 2025, which evidenced this intention. The respondents were represented before the Court. Based on the petitioner's explicit request to withdraw the petition, the Court allowed the withdrawal. Therefore, the Court did not decide on the merits of any GST-related issue or the validity of the order or action under challenge. The operative direction was to dismiss the writ petition as withdrawn.
Facts
The petitioner, Calcutta Club Limited, filed a writ petition (WPA 14487 of 2022) before the Calcutta High Court. The respondents were the Principal Commissioner of CGST and CX, Kolkata South CGST & CX Commissionerate, and others. The petition was filed challenging an order or action by the CGST and CX Authority. The specific tax period(s) and the amount in dispute are not recorded in the judgment. The procedural history leading to the writ petition is also not detailed. The matter came up for hearing on December 10, 2025.
Key Issues
The primary issue before the Court was whether the writ petition should be allowed to proceed. The petitioner, represented by Mr. Avra Mazumder, submitted that they were not willing to pursue the writ petition further and sought its withdrawal. The petitioner handed up a printout of an e-mail dated September 18, 2025, written by the petitioner to their learned Advocate-on-Record, indicating their intention to withdraw. The respondents were represented, but their arguments or contentions are not recorded in the judgment. No specific questions of law or fact were framed or debated, as the petitioner sought to withdraw the case.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
05 10.12. 2025 South CGST & CX Commissionerate and others. ---------------
Mr. Avra Mazumder, Ms. Alisha Das, Ms. Elina Dey, Ms. Maitreyee Naskar, Mr. Siddhartha Das. … for the petitioners.
Mr. Bhaskar Prosad Banerjee. … for the CGST & CX Authority.
Mr. Mazumder, learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner, submits that the petitioner is not willing to pursue the writ petition any further and seeks withdrawal of the writ petition. He hands up to the Court a print out of e-mail dated September 18, 2025 written by the petitioner to the learned Advocate-on-Record for the petitioner. Let the same be taken on record.
The respondents are represented.
As prayed for, WPA 14487 of 2022 along with CAN 1 of 2024 is dismissed as ‘withdrawn’.
(Om Narayan Rai, J.)
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Calcutta High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.