Calcutta Club LTD vs. Principal Comm Of CGST And Cx ,Kol And Ors

WPA/14482/2022HC CalcuttaGSTCNR WBCHCA028886202210 December 2025Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE OM NARAYAN RAI2 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

Held

The Court held that since the petitioner, Calcutta Club Limited, expressed its clear intention not to pursue the writ petition (WPA 14482 of 2022) and sought its withdrawal, the Court acceded to this request. The Court took on record the email communication from the petitioner to its counsel confirming this decision. Consequently, the writ petition and the accompanying application (CAN 1 of 2024) were dismissed as withdrawn. No specific findings were made on the merits of the case, as the proceedings were terminated at the petitioner's behest.

Facts

The petitioner, Calcutta Club Limited, filed a writ petition (WPA 14482 of 2022) along with an application (CAN 1 of 2024) before the Calcutta High Court. The respondents were the Principal Commissioner of CGST and CX, Kolkata South CGST & CX Commissionerate, and others. The petitioner's counsel informed the Court that the petitioner was no longer willing to pursue the writ petition and sought its withdrawal. A printout of an email dated September 18, 2025, from the petitioner to its Advocate-on-Record, expressing this intention, was submitted to the Court and taken on record. The respondents were represented.

Key Issues

The primary issue before the Court was whether the writ petition, as filed by Calcutta Club Limited against the Principal Commissioner of CGST and CX, Kolkata South CGST & CX Commissionerate and others, should be permitted to be withdrawn. The petitioner's counsel explicitly stated the petitioner's unwillingness to proceed further with the writ petition. The revenue or State did not present any arguments against the withdrawal. No specific legal provisions or precedents were debated as the matter was resolved by the petitioner's request for withdrawal.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

03 10.12. 2025 South CGST & CX Commissionerate and others. ---------------

Mr. Avra Mazumder, Ms. Alisha Das, Ms. Elina Dey, Ms. Maitreyee Naskar, Mr. Siddhartha Das. … for the petitioners.

Mr. Bhaskar Prosad Banerjee, Mr. Abhradip Maity. … for the CGST & CX Authority.

1.

Mr. Mazumder, learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner, submits that the petitioner is not willing to pursue the writ petition any further and seeks withdrawal of the writ petition. He hands up to the Court a print out of e-mail dated September 18, 2025 written by the petitioner to the learned Advocate-on-Record for the petitioner. Let the same be taken on record.

2.

The respondents are represented.

3.

As prayed for, WPA 14482 of 2022 along with CAN 1 of 2024 is dismissed as ‘withdrawn’.

(Om Narayan Rai, J.)

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Calcutta High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.