M/S Kse Electricals Private Limited And Anr vs. The Additional Commissioner, Kolkata South CGST And Cx Commissionerate And Ors

WPA/25125/2025HC CalcuttaGSTCNR WBCHCA051085202519 December 2025Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE OM NARAYAN RAI2 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

Held

The Court decided to dismiss the writ petition as withdrawn. The reasoning was based on the explicit request made by the petitioners' counsel, who stated that the petitioners were not willing to pursue the writ petition any further and had instructions to seek its withdrawal. The Court accepted this request and ordered the dismissal. The ratio decidendi is that a writ petition can be dismissed as withdrawn if the petitioner unequivocally expresses their intention to do so and provides instructions to their counsel. The operative direction was the dismissal of WPA 25125 of 2025 as 'withdrawn', with no costs awarded.

Facts

The petitioners, M/s. KSE Electricals Private Limited and another, filed a writ petition (WPA 25125 of 2025) before the Calcutta High Court. The respondents were the Additional Commissioner, Kolkata South CGST & CX Commissionerate, and others. The petitioners' counsel, Ms. Agarwal, submitted an e-mail dated December 17, 2025, indicating that the petitioners were no longer willing to pursue the writ petition and requested its withdrawal. The respondents were represented in court. The court took the e-mail on record.

Key Issues

1. Whether the writ petition should be dismissed as withdrawn, as requested by the petitioners. This issue turns on the petitioners' expressed desire to withdraw their case. The petitioner argued that they have received instructions to withdraw the writ petition and are not willing to pursue it further, as evidenced by an e-mail dated December 17, 2025. The revenue or State did not record any specific argument against the withdrawal.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

01 19.12. 2025

Ct. No. 551

Ab

IN THE CALCUTTA HIGH COURT CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE

WPA 25125 of 2025

M/s. KSE Electricals Private Limited and another Vs. The Additional Commissioner, Kolkata South CGST & CX Commissionerate and others. ---------------

Mr. Ankit Kanodia, Ms. Megha Agarwal, Mr. Piyush Khaitan. … for the petitioners.

Mr. Amal Kumar Datta. … for the Union of India.

1.

Ms. Agarwal, learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioners, hands up to Court a printout of an e-mail dated December 17, 2025 and submits that the petitioners are not willing to pursue the writ petition any further. It is submitted that she has instruction to request for withdrawal of the writ petition. The copy of the e-mail handed up to Court is taken on record.

2.

The respondents are represented.

3.

In view of the request made, WPA 25125 of 2025 stands dismissed as ‘withdrawn’. No costs.

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Calcutta High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.