Commissioner Of Service Tax Service Tax Ii Commissionerate Presently Known As Commissioner Of CGST vs. M/S. National Insurance Co. Limited

Original PDF →
CEXA/5/2026HC CalcuttaGSTCNR WBCHCO000455202620 February 2026Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ,HON'BLE JUSTICE UDAY KUMAR1 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Facts

The appellant, Commissioner of Service Tax (presently Commissioner of CGST), filed an appeal before the Calcutta High Court. The respondent is M/s. National Insurance Co. Limited. The appeal was filed with discrepancies and mistakes. The appellant's learned Advocate sought leave to withdraw the appeal and file it afresh on the same cause of action. Additionally, leave was sought to replace a photocopy of the Tribunal's certified copy with the original certified copy obtained from the department.

Held

The Court granted the appellant's request to withdraw the appeal due to discrepancies and mistakes in its filing. Leave was granted to the learned Advocate on Record of the appellant to withdraw the appeal and file it afresh on the self-same cause of action. Furthermore, the Court permitted the learned Advocate on Record of the appellant to receive the certified copy of the Tribunal from the department and replace it with a photocopy of the same. The Court did not decide on the substantive merits of the case, as the appeal was permitted to be withdrawn and refiled.

Key Issues

1. Whether the appeal, as filed, suffers from procedural defects that warrant its withdrawal and refiling. The appellant argued that there were discrepancies and mistakes in the filing of the appeal. They sought permission to withdraw the current appeal and file a fresh one based on the same cause of action. The appellant also requested permission to replace a photocopy of the Tribunal's certified copy with the original certified copy obtained from the department. The respondent's arguments are not recorded in the judgment.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

OD – 13 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Juri iction [Central Excise] ORIGINAL SIDE CEXA/5/2026 IA NO: GA/1/2026, GA/2/2026 COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX, SERVICE TAX II COMMISSIONERATE PRESENTLY KNOWN AS COMMISSIONER OF CGST VS M/S. NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LIMITED

BEFORE : THE HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ And THE HON’BLE JUSTICE UDAY KUMAR Date : 20th February, 2026 Appearance : Mr. Bhaskar Prasad Banerjee, Adv. Ms. Sretapa Sinha, Adv. …for appellant.

Mr. Arnab Chakraborty, Adv. Mr. Aniket Chaudhury, Adv. …for respondent.

The Court : As there are discrepancies and mistakes in filing the appeal, leave is granted to the learned Advocate on Record of the appellant to withdraw this appeal and file afresh on the self-same cause of action. Leave is granted to the learned Advocate on Record of the appellant to receive certified copy of the Tribunal from the department and replace it with a photocopy of the same. (RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ, J.)

(UDAY KUMAR, J.)

Reproduced from the public record of the Calcutta High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.