Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
APHC010619142025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3529]
TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR
WRIT PETITION NO: 32015/2025
Between:
1. PAWAN INFRASTRUCTURE CONSTRUCTIONS, REP. BY ITS
MANAGING PARTNER SRI YEERABALLI RAMA OBULREDDY D.NO.
2/127-D-8-2, MAHESWAR NAGAR, YERRAGUNTIA, KADAPA
DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH- 523240
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX, CGST
KADAPA DIVISION, II FLOOR, CITY PLAZA COMMERCIAL CENTRE,
0PP. DIST. COURT, RTC BUS STAND ROAD, KADAPA, ANDHRA
PRADESH - 516001. 2.
2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX, CGST KADAPA
DIVISION, II FLOOR, CITY PLAZA COMMERCIAL CENTRE, 0PP.
DIST. COURT, RTC BUS STAND ROAD, KADAPA, ANDHRA
PRADESH - 516001.
3. THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX, HQRS. OFFICE, TIRUPATI
CGST COMMISSIONERATE TIRUPATI, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4.
4. UNION OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF
FINANCE, 3RDFIOOR, JEEVAN DEEP BUILDING, SANSAD MARG,
NEW DELHI-110 001.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be
pleased topleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction particularly one in the
nature WRIT OF MANDAMUS Krishna District a. Setting aside the demand
of Service Tax of Rs. 4,21,335/- (Rupees four lakhs twenty-one thousand
three hundred and thirty-five only), being Service Tax of Rs. 3,93,245/-,
Swachh Bharat Cess of Rs. 14,045/-, and Krishi Kalyan Cess of Rs. 14,045/-
on M/s Pavan Infrastructure Constructions, under Section 73(2) of the
Finance Act, 1994, as detailed supra under the provisions of Sections 66 and
68 of the Finance Act, 1994, read with Section 174 of the CGST Act, 2017.
b. Setting aside the order for payment of interest at appropriate rate(s) in
terms of Section 75 of the Finance Act, 1994, as amended, read with Section
174 of CGST Act, 2017. c. Setting aside the imposing penalty under Section
76 of the Finance Act, 1994. d. Setting aside Penalty of Rs. 10,000/- or
Rs.200/- for every day during which such failure continues. whichever is
higher, starting with the first day after the due date, till the date of actual
compliance in terms of Section 77(l)(c) of the Finance Act, 1994 read with
Section 174 of CGST Act, 2017, for not submitting the documents/information
called for. e. Setting aside a penalty of Rs. 4,21,335/- (Rupees four lakhs
twenty one thousand three hundred and thirty five only) under Section 78 of
the Finance Act, 1994 as amended, read with Section 174 of the CGST Act,
2017, for contravening Section 66 and Section 68 of the Finance Act, 1994
and the Service Tax Rules, 1994, Provided that the penalty payable shall be
25PERCENT (twenty five per cent) of the penalty imposed, if the Service Tax
amount determined and confirmed as at (i) above, is paid along with
applicable interest within thirty days of receipt of this order and if such
reduced penalty at (v) is also paid within such period and f. Setting aside
demand a late fee of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty thousand only) @ Rs.
20,000/- per ST-3 return) on M/s Pavan Infrastructure Constructions, for non-
filing of prescribed ST-3 returns for the period April 2017 to June 2017 under
Section 70 of the Finance Act, 1994 read with Rule 7C of the Service Tax
Rules, 1994 g. Pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased
pleased to order stay of recovery of demand pursuant to the Impugned Order-
In-Original Number 43/2022 dated 11.05.2022 issued by Respondent No. 1,
and to pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. K.RAGHAVENDER REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. SANTHI CHANDRA
2. GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAX
The Court made the following Order: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao)
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition.
Such permission is accorded and the Writ Petition is accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.
_______________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J
________________ T.C.D. SEKHAR, J
AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR
WRIT PETITION NO: 32015/2025 (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao)