Duggar Fiber PVT. LTD vs. Commissioner Of CGST (North)

W.P.(C)/8676/2017HC DelhiGSTCNR DLHC01446854201716 May 2018Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR1 pages
For Petitioner: Dr. G.K. Sarkar, Ms. Malabika Sarkar, Mr. Prashant Srivastava & Mr. Deepak Mahajan, AdvocatesFor Respondent: Mr. Harpreet Singh, SSC
AI SummaryDismissed

Held

The Court allowed the petitioner, Duggar Fiber Pvt. Ltd., to withdraw the writ petition as infructuous. The Court granted the petitioner the liberty to file a fresh writ petition, if required and necessary, in accordance with the law. The Court did not delve into the merits of the original grievance or the specific order/action challenged. The reasoning was based on the petitioner's submission that the petition had become infructuous due to subsequent developments. The operative direction was the dismissal of the writ petition as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed. CM No. 15004/2018 was also dismissed as withdrawn.

Facts

The petitioner, Duggar Fiber Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition before the Delhi High Court challenging an order or action by the Commissioner of CGST (North). The specific tax period(s) and the exact nature of the order or action, along with the amount in dispute, are not recorded in the judgment. The procedural history indicates that the writ petition was filed in 2017, and a related miscellaneous application (CM No. 15004/2018) was filed in 2018. The petitioner's counsel stated that subsequent developments had rendered the writ petition infructuous and sought permission to withdraw it, reserving the right to file a fresh petition if necessary.

Key Issues

The primary issue before the Court was whether the writ petition, filed by Duggar Fiber Pvt. Ltd. against the Commissioner of CGST (North), should be permitted to be withdrawn as infructuous. The petitioner argued that due to subsequent developments, the petition was no longer maintainable in its current form and sought liberty to withdraw. The respondent, Commissioner of CGST (North), did not record any specific arguments against the withdrawal. The Court had to decide whether to allow the withdrawal with or without liberty to file a fresh petition.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
$~21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8676/2017 & CM No.15004/2018 DUGGAR FIBER PVT. LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Dr. G.K. Sarkar, Ms. Malabika Sarkar, Mr. Prashant Srivastava & Mr. Deepak Mahajan, Advocates versus COMMISSIONER OF CGST (NORTH) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Harpreet Singh, SSC CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR

O R D E R %

16.05.

2018

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the writ petition has become infructuous, in view of the subsequent developments. He seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition and states that, if required and necessary, the petitioner would file a fresh writ petition, in accordance with law.

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed. CM No.15004/2018 is also dismissed as withdrawn.

SANJIV KHANNA, J

CHANDER SHEKHAR, J MAY 16, 2018/tp

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Delhi High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.