Krish Automotors Private Limited vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.
Held
The Court held that the petitioner faced bonafide difficulties in filing the TRAN-1 form and should be given another opportunity. The respondents are directed to allow the petitioner to file the TRAN-1 form either electronically or manually.
Facts
The petitioner, Krish Automotors Private Limited, sought to claim Input Tax Credit (ITC) of Rs. 1,41,02,394/- under Section 140(3) of the CGST Act. They were unable to file the GST TRAN-1 form within the extended deadline of December 27, 2017, due to their accountant missing the due date.
Key Issues
Whether the petitioner should be allowed to file the GST TRAN-1 form manually or electronically after the prescribed deadline due to bonafide difficulties.
Sections Cited
Section 140(3), Rule 117
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
O R D E R %
2019
Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:
The Petitioner, registered under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 („CGST Act‟) has filed this petition inter-alia seeking a direction to the Respondents to permit the Petitioner to file the GST TRAN-I manually and allow the credit of Input Tax Credit („ITC‟) of Rs. 1,41,02,394/- claimed in accordance with Section 140 (3) of the CGST Act, 2017, in its online electronic credit ledger for payment of i
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Delhi High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.