Micromax Informatics LTD. vs. Union Of INDIA & Anr.

W.P.(C)/196/2019HC DelhiGSTCNR DLHC01000489201805 May 2020Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA,HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH33 pages
For Petitioner: Mr. Abhishek A. Rastogi, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Shiva Lakshmi, CGSC for UOI. Mr. Amit Bansal, SSC with Mr.AmanRewaria and Ms. Vipasha Mishra, Advocates for respondent No. 3
AI SummaryAllowed

Held

The Court held that Rule 117 of the CGST Rules, prescribing the time limit for filing TRAN-1, is directory and not mandatory. Consequently, the petitioners are entitled to avail input tax credit if they filed or attempted to file TRAN-1 within three years from the appointed date.

Facts

The petitioners sought to avail input tax credit by filing Form TRAN-1 beyond the prescribed period. They argued that Rule 117 of the CGST Rules, imposing a time limit, was arbitrary and unconstitutional. The respondents contended that the delay was not due to technical glitches on the GSTN portal.

Key Issues

Whether the time limit prescribed under Rule 117 for filing TRAN-1 is mandatory or directory, and if it can lead to forfeiture of accrued CENVAT credit.

Sections Cited

Section 140, Section 142, Rule 117

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Heard together (3 matters)

W.P.(C) 11040/2018
W.P.(C) 196/2019
W.P.(C) 8496/2019

Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.

W.P.(C) 11040/2018& connected matters * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Reserved on: 02.03.2020 Pronounced on: 05.05.2020 + W.P.(C) 11040/2018 and C.M. No. 42982/2018

BRAND EQUITY TREATIES LIMITED

..... Petitioner

Through: Mr. Abhishek A. Rastogi, Advocate.

versus

THE UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

..... Respondents

Through: Ms. Shiva Lakshmi, CGSC for UOI. Mr. Amit Bansal, SSC with Mr.AmanRewaria and Ms. Vipasha Mishra, Advocates for respondent No. 3. + W.P.(C) 196/2019& CM APPL. 965/2019

MICROMAX INFORMATICS LTD.

..... Petitioner

Through: Mr. Alok Yadav, Advocate.

versus

UNION OF INDIA & ANR.

..... Respondents

Through:

Mr. Amit Bansal, SSC with Mr.AmanRewaria and Ms. Vipasha Mishra, Advocates for respondent No. 2. + W.P.(C) 8496/2019

DEVELOPER GROUP INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Kavita Jha, Mr. Shammi Kapoor, Ms. Kritika Kapoor and Ms. Swati Agarwal, Advocates.

W.P.(C) 11040/2018& connected matt

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Delhi High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.