Bharti Airtel Limited vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.

W.P.(C)/6345/2018HC DelhiGSTCNR DLHC01148478201805 May 2020Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA,HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH25 pages
For Petitioner: Mr. Tarun Gulati, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Sparsh Bhargava, Mr. Vipin Upadhyay, Mr.Shashi Mathews, Mr. Kamal Arya, AdvsFor Respondent: Mr. Harpreet Singh, Sr. Standing counsel for R-2 to 4 with Ms. Suhani Mathur, Adv
AI SummaryAllowed

Held

The Court held that the restriction on rectifying GSTR-3B in the same period the error occurred, as stipulated by para 4 of Circular No. 26/26/2017-GST, is arbitrary and contrary to the GST Act. It allowed the petitioner to rectify its GSTR-3B for the period in which the error occurred.

Facts

Bharti Airtel Limited, due to the non-operationalization of GSTR-2 and GSTR-3 and the introduction of a summary GSTR-3B, inadvertently overpaid GST by approximately Rs. 923 crores between July and September 2017. The company discovered the excess payment later when GSTR-2A became available, but was prevented from correcting its returns.

Key Issues

Whether the restriction on rectifying GSTR-3B in the same tax period as the error is ultra vires the CGST Act and arbitrary. Whether the impugned circular and rule prevent the correction of genuine errors leading to excess tax payment.

Sections Cited

Rule 61(5), Section 49(6), Section 54

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

W.P.(C) 6345/2018 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Reserved on: 07.11.2019 Pronounced on: 05.05.2020

+ W.P.(C) 6345/2018, CM APPL. 45505/2019

BHARTI AIRTEL LIMITED

..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Tarun Gulati, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Sparsh Bhargava, Mr. Vipin Upadhyay, Mr.Shashi Mathews, Mr. Kamal Arya, Advs.

versus

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

..... Respondents Through: Mr. Harpreet Singh, Sr. Standing counsel for R-2 to 4 with Ms. Suhani Mathur, Adv.

CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA

J U D G M E N T

1.

Bharti Airtel Limited (hereinafter referred to as ‘Petitioner’) has preferred the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India impugning inter alia, Rule 61 (5) of the GST Rules, Form GSTR- 3B and Circular No. 26/26/2017-GST (hereinafter referred to as the ‘impugned circular’) dated 29.12.2017 as ultra vires the provisions of Ce

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Delhi High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.