Surendra Kumar Engineers And Builders vs. Commissioner, CGST, Audit-1

W.P.(C)/6420/2020HC DelhiGSTCNR DLHC01024907202015 September 2020Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA2 pages
For Petitioner: Mr. Aseem Mehrotra, AdvocateFor Respondent: Mr. Harpreet Singh, Senior Standing Counsel
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

Held

The Court decided to allow the petitioner's prayer for withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to file a statutory appeal before the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal. The Court reasoned that this was a limited prayer made by the petitioner after some arguments. Consequently, the Court disposed of the present writ petition and pending applications. The Court also granted an extension of the limitation period for filing the statutory appeal by one week, effective from 28th September, 2020. No issues were expressly left undecided, as the Court granted the relief sought by the petitioner.

Facts

The petitioner, Surendra Kumar Engineers and Builders, filed a writ petition before the Delhi High Court challenging an order or action by the Commissioner, CGST, Audit-1. The specific tax period and the amount in dispute are not recorded in the judgment. The procedural history indicates that the matter was listed due to urgency and heard via video conferencing. After initial arguments, the petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition to file a statutory appeal before the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal.

Key Issues

1. Whether the petitioner should be granted liberty to file a statutory appeal before the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal? 2. Whether the limitation period for filing the statutory appeal should be extended? The petitioner argued that they wished to withdraw the present writ petition to file a statutory appeal before the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal. They specifically prayed for an extension of the limitation period, which was expiring on 28th September, 2020, by one week. The respondent, Commissioner, CGST, Audit-1, did not record any specific arguments against the petitioner's prayer in the judgment.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P. (C) 6420/2020 & CM APPLs. 22719-22721/2020 SURENDRA KUMAR ENGINEERS AND BUILDERS ...... Petitioner Through: Mr. Aseem Mehrotra, Advocate. versus COMMISSIONER, CGST, AUDIT-1 ...... Respondent Through: Mr. Harpreet Singh, Senior Standing Counsel. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA

O R D E R %

15.09.

2020 The petition has been listed before this Bench by the Registry in view of the urgency expressed therein. The same has been heard by way of video conferencing. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file a statutory appeal before the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal. He however prays that the limitation which is expiring on 28th September, 2020 be extended by one week. Keeping in view the limited prayer, the present writ petition and pending applications are disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file appropriate proceedings before the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal and the limitation for th

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Delhi High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.