Ashish Kumar vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors

W.P.(C)/9685/2020HC DelhiGSTCNR DLHC01039333202127 January 2021Bench: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH58 pages
For Petitioner: Mr. Bharat Raichandani with Mr. Arjyadeep Roy, AdvocatesFor Respondent: Mr. Asheesh Jain, CGSC with Mr. Adarsh Kumar Gupta and Mr. Keshav Mann, Advocates for UOI along with Mr. Abhishek Khanna, Government Pleader for UOI. Mr. Aditya Singla, Sr. Standing Counsel for CBIC/R-2 with Mr. Yatharth Singh & Ms. A. Sahitya Veena, Advocate
AI SummaryDismissed

Held

The Court held that the impugned notifications are not ultra vires the Constitution or the GST Act. It found that the distinction drawn by the respondents between services provided through ECOs and other services was justified, and the levy was permissible under the relevant sections of the Act.

Facts

The petitions challenged notifications that withdrew GST exemption for auto-rickshaw and non-air-conditioned stage carriage services when booked through Electronic Commerce Operators (ECOs). Previously, these services were exempt from GST regardless of booking mode.

Key Issues

Whether the impugned notifications, which withdrew GST exemption for certain transport services booked via ECOs, are discriminatory and ultra vires the Constitution and the GST Act.

Sections Cited

Section 9(5), Section 11, Section 17

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Heard together (2 matters)

W.P.(C) 14048/2021
W.P.(C) 14579/2021

Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.

2023:DHC:2489 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 14048/2021 UBER INDIA SYSTEMS PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Bharat Raichandani with Mr. Arjyadeep Roy, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Asheesh Jain, CGSC with Mr.

Adarsh Kumar Gupta and Mr. Keshav Mann, Advocates for UOI along with Mr. Abhishek Khanna, Government Pleader for UOI.

Mr.

Aditya Singla, Sr.

Standing Counsel for CBIC/R-2 with Mr.

Yatharth Singh & Ms. A. Sahitya Veena, Advocate. + W.P.(C) 14579/2021 & CM APPL. 45963/2021 PRAGATISHEEL AUTO RIKSHAW DRIVER UNION ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. M.Shoeb Alam with Ms.Fauzia Shakil, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Asheesh Jain, CGSC with Mr.

Adarsh Kumar Gupta and Mr. Keshav Mann, Advocates for UOI along with Mr. Abhishek Khanna, Government Pleader for UOI.

Mr.

Aditya Singla, Sr.

Standing Counsel for CBIC/R-2 with Mr. 2023:DHC:2489 Yatharth Singh & Ms. A. Sahitya Veena, Advoca

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Delhi High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.