Pulkit vs. State (Nct Of Delhi)

BAIL APPLN./1456/2022HC DelhiGSTCNR DLHC01018226202226 July 2022Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA5 pages
For Petitioner: Mr.Kapil Madan, Mr.Gurmukh Singh Arora and Mr.Sahilendra Singh, AdvocatesFor Respondent: Mr.Laksh Khanna, APP for State
AI SummaryDismissed

Held

The Court held that the petitioner's previous involvement in a similar case with M/s Saraswati Enterprises, involving fraudulent claims of input tax credit, indicated a pattern of similar cheating. The Court found the petitioner's interrogation necessary to unearth the entire scam, especially given his alleged active role in registering M/s Kavita Industries and opening a bank account introduced by a fictitious person.

Facts

The prosecution alleged that the petitioner was involved in a scam involving M/s Kavita Industries, which fraudulently claimed input tax credit (ITC) of Rs. 47,46,08,310/- by filing FORM TRAN 1 without actual ITC availability. The firm then utilized this claimed ITC to square off its output tax liability. Investigations revealed fake invoices, non-existent bank accounts, and fake KYC documents.

Key Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail given his alleged involvement in a large-scale GST fraud and his previous involvement in similar cases. The court also considered whether the current FIR was a duplication of a previous FIR.

Sections Cited

Section 132(1)(B), Section 132(1)(C), Section 132

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 1456/2022, CRL.M.(BAIL) 561/2022 PULKIT ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Kapil Madan, Mr.Gurmukh Singh Arora and Mr.Sahilendra Singh, Advocates. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Laksh Khanna, APP for State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA

O R D E R %

26.07.

2022 BAIL APPLN. 1456/2022, CRL.M.(BAIL) 561/2022

1.

This is an application preferred on behalf of the petitioner under Section 438 read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail in FIR No.60/2019, under Section 417/420/467/468/471/120B I.P.C. and Sections 132(1)(B) and 132(1)(C) Central Goods and Services Tax Act(CGST), 2017 registered at Police Station: EOW.

2.

In nutshell, as per the case of the prosecution, the amount of GST against the sales made by M/s Kavita Industries was collected by Shubham Khandelwal @ Shubham in PNB account No.0122002110621806.As per rules and regulations of CGST Act, the onus of depositing the tax collected is with the seller i.e. M/s Kavita Industries. However, the accused persons abused t

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Delhi High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.