M/S Kishan Lal Kuria Mal International vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.

W.P.(C)/10822/2022HC DelhiGSTCNR DLHC01026854202206 October 2022Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN,HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA5 pages
For Petitioner: Ms. Sakshi Singhal & Ms. Lovely Singh. AdvocatesFor Respondent: Mr. Himanshu Pathak, Sr. Panel Counsel for R-1/UOI. Ms. Anushree Narain & Ms. Sapna Jain, Advocates for Customs. 36
AI SummaryAllowed

Held

The Court held that the impugned notification and circular were ultra vires and that Rule 96 of the CGST Rules, 2017, clearly entitled exporters to IGST refund. The Gujarat High Court's judgment in M/s Amit Cotton Industries, upheld by the Supreme Court, was found to be squarely applicable.

Facts

Petitioners sought refund of IGST paid on exported goods during the transitional period, claiming they were denied refund due to claiming higher duty drawback rates. This was due to confusion during the transition to new tax laws.

Key Issues

Whether exporters are entitled to IGST refund on goods exported during the transitional period even if they claimed higher duty drawback rates. Whether the impugned notification and circular denying such refund are valid.

Sections Cited

Section 16, Section 54, Rule 96

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Heard together (2 matters)

W.P.(C) 10822/2022
W.P.(C) 10406/2021

Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.

$~7 & 36 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 10822/2022 M/S KISHAN LAL KURIA MAL INTERNATIONAL ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Sakshi Singhal & Ms. Lovely Singh. Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Himanshu Pathak, Sr. Panel Counsel for R-1/UOI. Ms. Anushree Narain & Ms. Sapna Jain, Advocates for Customs. 36 + W.P.(C) 10406/2021 M/S OVERSEAS COMMITMENT & ORS. ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Sakshi Singhal & Ms. Lovely Singh. Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Shoumendu Mukherji, Sr. Panel Counsel with Ms. Meghna Sharma & Mr. Rajat Kashyap, Advocate for R- 1/UOI. Ms. Anushree Narain & Ms. Sapna Jain, Advocates for Customs. % Date of Decision: 06th October, 2022 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA This is a digitally signed Judgement. NEUTRAL CITATION NO: 2022/DHC/004086 J U D G M E N T MANMOHAN, J (Oral):

1.

Present writ petitions have been filed seeking declarations that Paragraph 11(d) read with 12A(a)(ii) of the Notes and Conditions of the Notifica

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Delhi High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.