New Sr Telecom Through Its Proprietor Sh. Zeeshan Khan vs. Commissioner Of CGST, Delhi & Ors.

W.P.(C)/17052/2022HC DelhiGSTCNR DLHC01081063202217 January 2023Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV2 pages
For Petitioner: Mr. M.A. Ansari & Mr. Khursheed Ahmad, AdvsFor Respondent: Mr. Piyush Beriwal, Adv
AI SummaryDismissed

Facts

The petitioner, New SR Telecom, through its proprietor Sh. Zeeshan Khan, filed a writ petition before the Delhi High Court challenging an order cancelling its GST registration. The respondents are the Commissioner of CGST, Delhi, and others. The specific tax period and the authority that passed the cancellation order are not explicitly detailed in the provided text. The amount in dispute is also not mentioned. The procedural history leading to the petition is not elaborated, other than the fact that the petitioner's registration was cancelled, preventing them from filing GST returns.

Held

The Court noted the statement made by the learned counsel for the respondents. The respondents undertook to restore the petitioner's GST registration for a period of thirty days. Furthermore, they agreed to review the order cancelling the registration, provided the petitioner files its GST returns and submits proof of its operating premises. The Court observed that this statement addressed the petitioner's grievance. The petitioner's counsel then sought to withdraw the petition. The Court also noted that it would be open for the petitioner to seek a waiver of any penalty imposed for late filing of returns, as the inability to file was due to the cancellation of registration. The respondents are to consider this request in accordance with the law. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn with these observations.

Key Issues

1. Whether the cancellation of the petitioner's GST registration was justified, necessitating a review of the order. (Mixed question of law and fact, potentially relating to provisions governing GST registration cancellation). The petitioner's primary grievance was the cancellation of its GST registration, which prevented it from filing returns. The petitioner argued that this cancellation caused hardship and prevented compliance. The respondents, on instructions, stated that they would restore the petitioner's registration for thirty days and review the cancellation order subject to the petitioner filing its GST returns and providing proof of its operating premises. The respondents did not explicitly state their legal arguments for the initial cancellation but agreed to a review process.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
$~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 17052/2022 NEW SR TELECOM THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR SH. ZEESHAN KHAN ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. M.A. Ansari & Mr. Khursheed Ahmad, Advs. Versus COMMISSIONER OF CGST, DELHI & ORS..... Respondents Through: Mr. Piyush Beriwal, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN

O R D E R %

17.01.

2023

1.

The learned counsel appearing for the respondents, on instructions, states that the respondents shall restore the petitioner’s registration for a period of thirty days and, subject to the petitioner filing its GST returns, as well as the proof of the premises from where it is operating, the order cancelling the registration shall be reviewed.

2.

In view of the aforesaid statement, the petitioner’s grievance stands addressed.

3.

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition.

4.

It will be open for the petitioner to seek waiver of the penalty imposed for late filing of the return as the petitioner was unable to do so on account of cancellation of its registration. Needless to

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Delhi High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.