Uber INDIA Systems Private Limited vs. Union Of INDIA & Anr.

W.P.(C)/14048/2021HC DelhiGSTCNR DLHC01038208202112 April 2023Bench: CASES PERTAINING TO SPL.DIVISION BENCHES58 pages
For Petitioner: Mr. Bharat Raichandani with Mr. Arjyadeep Roy, AdvocatesFor Respondent: Mr. Asheesh Jain, CGSC with Mr. Adarsh Kumar Gupta and Mr. Keshav Mann, Advocates for UOI along with Mr. Abhishek Khanna, Government Pleader for UOI. Mr. Aditya Singla, Sr. Standing Counsel for CBIC/R-2 with Mr. Yatharth Singh & Ms. A. Sahitya Veena, Advocate
AI SummaryDismissed

Held

The Court held that the impugned notifications are not ultra vires the Constitution or the GST Act. It found that the distinction made by the respondents regarding the nature of services and the mode of booking was justified and did not create unreasonable classification.

Facts

The petitions challenged notifications that withdrew GST exemption for auto-rickshaw and non-air-conditioned stage carriage services when booked through Electronic Commerce Operators (ECOs). Previously, these services were exempt from GST, irrespective of the booking method.

Key Issues

Whether the withdrawal of GST exemption for auto-rickshaw and non-air-conditioned stage carriage services booked through ECOs is discriminatory and unconstitutional. Whether the impugned notifications were issued within the powers granted by the GST Act.

Sections Cited

Section 9(5), Section 11, Section 17

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Heard together (2 matters)

W.P.(C) 14048/2021
W.P.(C) 14579/2021

Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.

2023:DHC:2489 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 14048/2021 UBER INDIA SYSTEMS PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Bharat Raichandani with Mr. Arjyadeep Roy, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Asheesh Jain, CGSC with Mr.

Adarsh Kumar Gupta and Mr. Keshav Mann, Advocates for UOI along with Mr. Abhishek Khanna, Government Pleader for UOI.

Mr.

Aditya Singla, Sr.

Standing Counsel for CBIC/R-2 with Mr.

Yatharth Singh & Ms. A. Sahitya Veena, Advocate. + W.P.(C) 14579/2021 & CM APPL. 45963/2021 PRAGATISHEEL AUTO RIKSHAW DRIVER UNION ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. M.Shoeb Alam with Ms.Fauzia Shakil, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Asheesh Jain, CGSC with Mr.

Adarsh Kumar Gupta and Mr. Keshav Mann, Advocates for UOI along with Mr. Abhishek Khanna, Government Pleader for UOI.

Mr.

Aditya Singla, Sr.

Standing Counsel for CBIC/R-2 with Mr. 2023:DHC:2489 Yatharth Singh & Ms. A. Sahitya Veena, Advoca

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Delhi High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.