Mayank Garg vs. Municipal Corporation Of Delhi & Ors.

W.P.(C)/6015/2023HC DelhiGSTCNR DLHC01017304202309 May 2023Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI32 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

Held

The High Court held that the services rendered by the petitioner qualified as export of services. The Court found that the services were advisory in nature and not related to immovable property or intermediary services, thus the place of supply was outside India.

Facts

The petitioner provided advisory services to an overseas group company for investments in India. The tax authorities rejected the petitioner's refund claims for unutilized Input Tax Credit, arguing the services did not constitute an export because the place of supply was in India.

Key Issues

Whether advisory services provided to an overseas entity for investment in India constitute an export of services under GST law. The key issue was determining the place of supply for these services.

Sections Cited

Section 13, Section 54, Section 17(5)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Heard together (2 matters)

W.P.(C) Nos. 14427/2022
W.P.(C) 14461/2022

Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.

W.P.(C) Nos. 14427/2022, 14461/2022 & 6014/2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI %

Judgment delivered on: 17.08.2023 + W.P.(C) 14427/2022 M/S CUBE HIGHWAYS AND TRANSPORTATION ASSETS ADVISOR PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Petitioner versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER CGST DIVISION & ORS.

..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case:

For the Petitioner : Mr. Tarun Gulati, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Kishore

Kunal, Mr. Parth, Mr. Shakaib Khan & Mr.

Shubham Bajaj, Advs. For the Respondents : Mr. R. Ramachandran, Sr. SC. AND + W.P.(C) 14461/2022 M/S CUBE HIGHWAYS AND TRANSPORTATION ASSETS ADVISOR PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Petitioner versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER CGST DIVISION & ORS.

..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case:

For the Petitioner : Mr. Tarun Gulati, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Kishore

Kunal, Mr. Parth, Mr. Shakaib Khan & Mr.

Shubham Bajaj, Advs. For the Respondents : Mr. R. Ramachandran, Sr. SC. AND W.P.(C) Nos. 14427/2022, 14461/20

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Delhi High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.