Bses Rajdhani Power LTD & Anr. vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.

W.P.(C)/9455/2018HC DelhiGSTCNR DLHC01266374201813 December 2023Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN10 pages
For Petitioner: Mr. Arvind Datar, Sr. Adv. Mr. Tarun Gulati, Sr. Adv, Mr. Anupam Varma, Mr. Manish Mishra, Mr. Nikhil Sharma, Ms. Manu Tiwari, Mr. Aditya Dhingra & Mr. Ankur Mittal, AdvsFor Respondent: Mr. Kamal Digpaul & Ms. Ishita Pathak, Advs. for Mr. Ajay Digpaul, CGSC. Mr. Harpreet Singh, SSC with Ms. Suhani Mathur & Mr. Gurpreet Singh Gulati, Advs. Mr. Arjun Jain, Adv. for R-2 & 3 through video conference
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

Held

The Court directed that any GST collected by the petitioners after November 8, 2023, be refunded to the customers. It clarified that the supplies in question are bundled supplies and an integral part of electricity distribution, thus not chargeable to GST.

Facts

The petitioners, an electricity distribution utility, challenged a GST circular that clarified certain charges collected from consumers were taxable. They argued these charges were integral to the exempt service of electricity distribution.

Key Issues

Whether certain charges collected by electricity distribution utilities are taxable under GST, or if they are part of the exempt composite supply of electricity distribution.

Sections Cited

Section 8, Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

W.P.(C) 9455/2018 $~45 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI %

Date of Decision: 13th December, 2023 + W.P.(C) 9455/2018 & CM APPL. 62085/2023 BSES RAJDHANI POWER LTD & ANR. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Arvind Datar, Sr. Adv. Mr. Tarun Gulati, Sr. Adv, Mr. Anupam Varma, Mr. Manish Mishra, Mr. Nikhil Sharma, Ms. Manu Tiwari, Mr. Aditya Dhingra & Mr. Ankur Mittal, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kamal Digpaul & Ms. Ishita Pathak, Advs. for Mr. Ajay Digpaul, CGSC. Mr. Harpreet Singh, SSC with Ms. Suhani Mathur & Mr. Gurpreet Singh Gulati, Advs. Mr. Arjun Jain, Adv. for R-2 & 3 through video conference. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN VIBHU BAKHRU, J. (Oral)

1.

The petitioners have filed the present petition, inter alia, praying as under: “(a) Quash and set aside the clarification issued in para 4(1) of the Circular No. 34/8/2018-GST dated 01.03.2018 by the Government of India. W.P.(C) 9455/2018 (b) Declare that in terms of Notif

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Delhi High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.