Alex Tour And Travel Private Limited vs. Deputy Commissioner, CGST, Uttam Nagar Division

W.P.(C)/2738/2024HC DelhiGSTCNR DLHC01008554202403 April 2024Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA2 pages
For Petitioner: Mr. Yogendra Aldak, Mr. Yatharth Tripathi, AdvocatesFor Respondent: Mr. Anurag Ojha, SSC with Mr. Subham Kumar, Advocate
AI SummaryDismissed

Facts

The petitioner, Alex Tour and Travel Private Limited, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated December 29, 2023, passed by the Additional Commissioner. This order had rejected the petitioner's request for interest on a delayed refund for the tax period 2018-19. The respondent, Deputy Commissioner, CGST, Uttam Nagar Division, informed the Court that following the notice in the proceedings, the matter was re-examined. Consequently, interest for the period 2018-19 and a refund for the tax period 2019-20 were sanctioned. A pay order for Rs. 17,70,132/- dated April 2, 2024, and a cheque dated April 2, 2024, were issued and presented to the Court.

Held

The Court noted the submission by the learned counsel for the respondent that pursuant to the issuance of notice in the present proceedings, the matter was re-examined. The respondent confirmed that interest for the tax period 2018-19, which was the subject of the impugned order, has been duly sanctioned. Furthermore, a refund for the tax period 2019-20 has also been sanctioned. The interest has been computed, and a pay order in the sum of Rs. 17,70,132/- dated April 2, 2024, along with a cheque of the same date, has been issued. The learned counsel for the petitioner stated that since the grievance has been redressed, they do not wish to press the petition further. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.

Key Issues

1. Whether the petitioner is entitled to interest on the delayed refund for the tax period 2018-19, as per the relevant provisions of the CGST Act and Rules. The petitioner contended that they were entitled to interest due to the delay in the sanction and disbursement of their refund. The respondent, while initially passing an order rejecting the request, later submitted that the matter was re-examined and interest has been sanctioned. No specific arguments were recorded for the respondent's initial rejection, but their subsequent submission indicated a change in stance following the court proceedings. The respondent also stated that refund for the tax period 2019-20 was also sanctioned, and a pay order and cheque for a total sum of Rs. 17,70,132/- were issued.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
$~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2738/2024 ALEX TOUR AND TRAVEL PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Yogendra Aldak, Mr. Yatharth Tripathi, Advocates. versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, CGST, UTTAM NAGAR DIVISION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Anurag Ojha, SSC with Mr. Subham Kumar, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA

O R D E R %

03.04.

2024

1.

Petitioner impugns order dated 29.12.2023, whereby the Additional Commissioner had rejected the request of the petitioner for grant of interest on the delayed payment of refund for the tax period 2018-19. 2. Learned counsel for respondent submits that pursuant to issuance of notice in these proceedings, the matter was re-examined by the Deputy Commissioner and interest for the said period has been duly sanctioned. He submits that not only for the said period, but refund has also been sanctioned for the tax period 2019-20. The interest has been computed and a pay order in the sum of Rs. 17,70,132/- dated 02.04.2024 has been issued. A copy of the order dated 02.04.2024 and a cheque dated 02.04.20

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Delhi High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.