Alliance Telenet Private Limited vs. Principal Commissioner, Central Excise And CGST, Delhi South

W.P.(C)/9438/2024HC DelhiGSTCNR DLHC01040085202412 July 2024Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA1 pages
For Petitioner: Mr Bharat Bhushan, Ms Nidhi Gupta, Ms Garima Thirani and Mr Ananay Mishra, AdvocatesFor Respondent: Mr Atul Tripathi, Senior Standing Counsel for CGST
AI SummaryDismissed

Facts

The petitioner, Alliance Telenet Private Limited, filed a writ petition before the Delhi High Court challenging an order or action by the Principal Commissioner, Central Excise and CGST, Delhi South. The specific tax period(s) and the amount in dispute are not recorded in the judgment. The procedural history leading to the filing of the writ petition is also not detailed. The matter came before the High Court for hearing.

Held

The Court noted that after some arguments were made, the learned counsel for the petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition and the accompanying application as withdrawn. No substantive issues regarding GST law or the respondent's actions were decided on merits. The reasoning was purely procedural, based on the petitioner's decision to withdraw the case. The ratio decidendi would be that a petitioner has the right to withdraw their case at any stage, and the court will dismiss it as withdrawn upon such request. No specific operative directions were issued beyond the dismissal.

Key Issues

The Court had to decide whether the writ petition filed by the petitioner should be entertained. The petitioner's counsel, after some arguments, sought to withdraw the present petition. The respondent, represented by the Senior Standing Counsel for CGST, did not present any arguments as the petitioner sought withdrawal. No specific legal provisions were explicitly named or debated in the context of the issues before the court, as the matter was resolved by the petitioner's request for withdrawal.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
$~29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 9438/2024 ALLIANCE TELENET PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr Bharat Bhushan, Ms Nidhi Gupta, Ms Garima Thirani and Mr Ananay Mishra, Advocates. versus PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER, CENTRAL EXCISE AND CGST, DELHI SOUTH .....Respondent Through: Mr Atul Tripathi, Senior Standing Counsel for CGST. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA

O R D E R % 12.07.2024 CM APPL.38743/2024 (Exemption)

1.

Exemption is allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2.

Application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 9438/2024 and CM APPL.38742/2024

3.

After some arguments, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition.

4.

The petition and the application are dismissed as withdrawn. VIBHU BAKHRU, J SACHIN DATTA, J JULY 12, 2024 RK This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 00:07:32

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Delhi High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.