M/S Technofab International vs. The Additional Commissioner Of CGST Delhi & Anr.

Original PDF →
W.P.(C)/10404/2024HC DelhiGSTCNR DLHC01045227202430 July 2024Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA2 pages
For Petitioner: Mr Vibhash Kr Jha, Mr Rajat Pandey and Ms Manju Pandey, AdvocatesFor Respondent: Mr.Arnav Kumar, SSC and Mr.Aranya Sahay, Advocates
AI SummaryRemanded

Facts

The petitioner, M/s. Technofab International, filed a writ petition before the Delhi High Court seeking a direction to the respondents (Additional Commissioner of CGST Delhi & Anr.) to restore its GST registration. This restoration was sought in terms of an order dated 28.05.2024 passed by the Appellate Authority. The respondents' counsel stated that the said order was with the Review Branch. The High Court noted that the petition lacked crucial details regarding the proceedings leading to the Appellate Authority's order, the grounds for the cancellation of the petitioner's GST registration, the order of the Adjudicating Authority, and the appeal filed by the petitioner against that order.

Held

The High Court held that it was not inclined to entertain the present writ petition in its current form. The Court found the petition to be bereft of essential details, including the grounds for cancellation of the petitioner's GST registration, the order passed by the Adjudicating Authority, and the appeal filed by the petitioner. Without these material particulars, the Court could not proceed to issue directions for the restoration of the GST registration as sought by the petitioner. The reasoning was based on the inadequacy of the information provided in the petition to adjudicate the matter effectively. The Court did not decide on the merits of the petitioner's claim for restoration of GST registration.

Key Issues

1. Whether the present writ petition is maintainable in its current form, given the lack of material particulars regarding the proceedings that led to the order dated 28.05.2024 passed by the Appellate Authority, the grounds for cancellation of GST registration, the order of the Adjudicating Authority, and the appeal filed by the petitioner. Petitioner's contention: The petitioner sought restoration of its GST registration based on an order from the Appellate Authority. No specific arguments were recorded for the petitioner regarding the maintainability of the petition in its current form. Revenue's contention: The respondents' counsel indicated that the order sought to be implemented was under review. No specific arguments were recorded for the respondents regarding the maintainability of the petition.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
$~61 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 10404/2024 and CM APPL. 42765/2024 M/S TECHNOFAB INTERNATIONAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr Vibhash Kr Jha, Mr Rajat Pandey and Ms Manju Pandey, Advocates. versus THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF CGST DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr.Arnav Kumar, SSC and Mr.Aranya Sahay, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA

O R D E R % 30.07.2024

1.

The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, praying that the direction be issued to the respondents to restore its GST registration in terms of the order dated 28.05.2024 passed by the Appellate Authority.

2.

The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents on advance notice submits that the said order is with the Review Branch.

3.

The present petition is bereft of any details as to the proceedings that have culminated in the order dated 28.05.2024 – the implementation of which is sought by the petitioner.

4.

The present petition does not disclose the grounds on which the GST registration of the petitioner was cancelled; the order passed by the Adjudicating Authority cancelling the GST registration of the petitioner; as well as the appeal filed by the petitioner against the said order.

5.

In view of the above, we are not inclined to entertain the present This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 01:52:54

petition. The same is disposed of with the liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh comprehensive petition with all material particulars. Pending application also stands disposed of. VIBHU BAKHRU, J SACHIN DATTA, J JULY 30, 2024 M Click here to check corrigendum, if any This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 01:52:54

Reproduced from the public record of the Delhi High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.