Pineview Technology Private Limited vs. The Commmissioner Central Tax, CGST Delhi West, & Ors.

W.P.(C)/5285/2024HC DelhiGSTCNR DLHC01019666202429 August 2024Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA1 pages
For Petitioner: Mr. Dhruv Gautam, AdvFor Respondent: Mr. Anurag Ojha, Mr. Subham Kumar, Mr. Dipak Raj Singh & Kumar Abhishek, Advs
AI SummaryDismissed

Facts

The petitioner, Pineview Technology Private Limited, filed a writ petition before the Delhi High Court. The petitioner had received an order disposing of its objections under Section 159(5) of the Central Goods & Services Tax Rules, 2017. The learned counsel for the petitioner stated that they wished to withdraw the present petition. They sought liberty to file a fresh petition, which would include a challenge to the aforementioned order disposing of objections.

Held

The Court considered the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner sought to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file a fresh petition, which would also include a challenge to the order disposing of its objections under Section 159(5) of the Central Goods & Services Tax Rules, 2017. The Court acceded to this request. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn, with the liberty granted to the petitioner to file a fresh petition as sought. No specific findings were made on the merits of the case or the order under challenge, as the petition was withdrawn.

Key Issues

1. Whether the petitioner should be granted liberty to withdraw the present writ petition with the liberty to file a fresh petition, including a challenge to the order disposing of objections under Section 159(5) of the Central Goods & Services Tax Rules, 2017? The petitioner argued that they wished to withdraw the current petition and file a fresh one to include a challenge to the order passed under Section 159(5) of the CGST Rules, 2017. The respondents' arguments are not recorded in the judgment.

Sections Cited

Section 159(5)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
$~75 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5285/2024 & CM No.21596/2024 PINEVIEW TECHNOLOGY PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Dhruv Gautam, Adv. Versus THE COMMMISSIONER CENTRAL TAX, CGST DELHI WEST, & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anurag Ojha, Mr. Subham Kumar, Mr. Dipak Raj Singh & Kumar Abhishek, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA

O R D E R % 29.08.2024

1.

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that the petitioner has been served with an order disposing of its objections under Section 159(5) of the Central Goods & Services Tax Rules, 2017. 2. He seeks to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file afresh including raising a challenge to the aforesaid order.

3.

The petition is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. VIBHU BAKHRU, J SACHIN DATTA, J AUGUST 29, 2024 ‘gsr’ Click here to check corrigendum, if any This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/09/2024 at 11:58:00

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Delhi High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.