Vigor Global Venture vs. Commissioner Of GST Delhi & Anr.

W.P.(C)/2222/2025HC DelhiGSTCNR DLHC01008271202520 February 2025Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMA2 pages
For Petitioner: Mr. Abhas Mishra, AdvFor Respondent: Mr. K. G. Gopalakrishnan, Adv
AI SummaryAllowed

Facts

The petitioner, Vigor Global Venture, filed a writ petition before the Delhi High Court challenging an order in appeal dated October 15, 2024, and an RFD-06 dated April 30, 2022, issued by Respondent No. 2. The petitioner sought to quash these orders and sought a direction to allow their application for a refund of Rs. 9,00,971/-. The petitioner's appeal before the Objection Hearing Authority was dismissed, with the authority upholding the impugned order of rejection of refund dated April 30, 2022. The Proper Officer (Ward-61) was directed to ensure compliance with the directions. The petitioner contended that the order impugned was unreasoned.

Held

The Court held that the Order-in-Appeal dated October 15, 2024, was wholly unreasoned and could not sustain. Consequently, the writ petition was allowed, and the said Order-in-Appeal was quashed. The Court directed that the appeal shall stand revived on the board of the Objection Hearing Authority to be heard afresh and in accordance with law. All rights and contentions of the respective parties on merits were kept open. The Court did not make any specific findings on the entitlement to the refund amount or the merits of the original refund application, as the matter was remanded for fresh consideration.

Key Issues

1. Whether the Order-in-Appeal dated October 15, 2024, and the RFD-06 dated April 30, 2022, are liable to be quashed on the grounds of being unreasoned, thereby violating principles of natural justice, as argued by the Petitioner? 2. Whether the Petitioner is entitled to a refund of Rs. 9,00,971/-, as sought in their application filed under the CGST/DGST Act, 2017, given the perfunctory rejection of their appeal? The Petitioner argued that the order impugned was wholly unreasoned and could not sustain. The Revenue (Commissioner of GST Delhi & Anr.) did not record any specific arguments in the judgment.

Sections Cited

CGST/DGST Act, 2017

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
$~90 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2222/2025 VIGOR GLOBAL VENTURE .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhas Mishra, Adv. versus COMMISSIONER OF GST DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. K. G. Gopalakrishnan, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR % 20.02.2025

O R D E R

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CM APPL. 10430/2025 (Ex.)

The application is disposed of.

1.

This writ petition has been preferred seeking the following reliefs:- W.P.(C) 2222/2025 “a. Issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, in the nature of Certiorari or any other Writ for the purpose of quashing the impugned order in appeal dated 15.10.2024 and the RFD 06 dated 30.04.2022 issued by Respondent No. 2 and / or; b. Issue Writ, Order or Direction in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondent No. 2 to allow the application for refund of Rs. 9,00,971/-(Rupees Nine Lakhs and Nine Hundred Seventy- One Only) filed under CGST/DGST Act, 20 17; and/or; Pass such other or further order(s) in favour of the Petitioner, which this Hon'bl

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Delhi High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.